|
Post by macca on Feb 16, 2019 20:50:15 GMT
Nothings unidentifiable if you've got access to a mass spectrometer.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Feb 16, 2019 20:55:17 GMT
It's how the science is interpreted obviously...
S'cuse the drift, but the performance of DACs is an interesting one. Measured in a more basic form, some DACs look amazingly good, but widen the measurement 'window' and all manner of previously hidden crap comes to light. Class D amps have all manner of nasty noises, but early ones did this too near to audio frequencies, where current designs push all this out to several hundred kHz where hopefully, they're not going to cause problems - bear with me here...
I suppose what one needs to do with grounding boxes is to know what and where to measure. If there's any effect at all, what frequency does it start at and how does it react with what's coming out further upstream? if it's adding rf 'stuff' as the Entreq appears to do, is this having a smoothing effect on the power supplies around and about, or the output of a DAC or similar?
I have to ask as regards the Coherent box, how does it perform (or not) into conventional well known gear, as I don't think he sells much that's heard of/well known on these shores (just an observation, nothing more sinister).
|
|
|
Post by macca on Feb 16, 2019 21:11:27 GMT
I have to ask as regards the Coherent box, how does it perform (or not) into conventional well known gear, as I don't think he sells much that's heard of/well known on these shores (just an observation, nothing more sinister). He does Bel Canto, Cabasse, Puresound, TAD, Quadral and Trichord, I'd say they are all known brands to anyone with an interest beyond budget kit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2019 21:32:32 GMT
I have to ask as regards the Coherent box, how does it perform (or not) into conventional well known gear, as I don't think he sells much that's heard of/well known on these shores (just an observation, nothing more sinister). He does Bel Canto, Cabasse, Puresound, TAD, Quadral and Trichord, I'd say they are all known brands to anyone with an interest beyond budget kit. Demoed on his own high end gear. I think Simon is paying me a visit next weekend so I'll try and get the box here. It's not quite "conventional" as only the Krell and TT is standard. I did say early on, I didn't think the same effect would be had here.
|
|
|
Post by macca on Feb 16, 2019 22:39:51 GMT
Why don't you think you will get the same effect at yours?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2019 23:03:47 GMT
Why don't you think you will get the same effect at yours? I use a BMU, Have ferrites and shielded mains cables. Alan doesn't have any of that in his kit. I just don't know if it can have the same effect. Believe me, if it does, I'll be surprised.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2019 2:44:01 GMT
Here's hoping the innards aren't identified. If they were, the entertainment value of this thread would be the worse for it.
The last time I looked - which was some time ago - Top Cat ("close friends get to call him TC...") said what WASN'T inside. The two I remember are minerals and iron fillings; there were others. So that's a starting point. Is it unusually heavy for it's size?
Still seems a bit odd that some seem to think there should be some direct correlation between the cost of materials and the final price. In a fair and just world there would be, but life isn't fair or just. You're paying for the "intellectual property", as it were. Does have me wondering how you actually arrive at a price for such an item.
Just looked on eBay and you can get Entreq binding posts. Two types: Everest @ £240 and K2 @j just £170. Made of 4 minerals (Everest, anyway). Someone must be snapping them up (and the boxes), as the available number is 1 for what I looked at.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2019 3:09:35 GMT
Jez said himself no-one really knows why some amps sound better than others and yet there is no unknown science in an amplifier... Unless, of course, there's unknown unknowns.... Which would explain why.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2019 3:19:44 GMT
If I'm going to question someone's integrity then I've always found it best to have some solid evidence to bring to the table first. Just to, you know, avoid looking like a total twat. Careful with the T word in Jez's vicinity, Martin. You know what it led to the last time. Wonder if his view on phono plugs has changed...?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2019 5:44:00 GMT
What intrigues me is that if there is an unidentifiable material or blend of in the box, why go to the trouble of filling the fastener heads so it can’t be opened? Perish the thought Cagey lad ........ But could it possibly be that the contents of said mystery boxes cost no more than a spade full of common garden dirt, put therein by unscrupulous con men and promoted by shill monkeys to fleece gullible punters and fools of their dosh. via Imgflip Meme Generator
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2019 7:00:43 GMT
Nothings unidentifiable if you've got access to a mass spectrometer. The typical piece of equipment any self respecting audiophile has lying around the home...
|
|
|
Post by pauld on Feb 17, 2019 9:02:12 GMT
Jez said himself no-one really knows why some amps sound better than others and yet there is no unknown science in an amplifier... Unless, of course, there's unknown unknowns.... Which would explain why. Agree, we are a species are learning everyday so to say we know everything about anything now is naive.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Feb 17, 2019 9:31:53 GMT
I have to ask as regards the Coherent box, how does it perform (or not) into conventional well known gear, as I don't think he sells much that's heard of/well known on these shores (just an observation, nothing more sinister). He does Bel Canto, Cabasse, Puresound, TAD, Quadral and Trichord, I'd say they are all known brands to anyone with an interest beyond budget kit. So, deluxe names and price tags with seemingly little to get the music flowing then (some Puresound is nice though but it's difficult to sell new these days)? All basically unknown outside the forums and Quadral were hardly musical speakers as I remember - all 'HiFi' fire and sharpness as I remember, a bit like Dyn-Audio. With stuff like that, no wonder you need all these add-on boxes to try to make it work in a satisfactory more 'human' fashion... All just my opinion and experiences of course and ymmv... I'm biting hard through gritted teeth, but *current* Linn and Naim probably has a hell of a lot more to offer in musical terms, such has their gear moved on. hell, even an expensive Linn streamer actually 'measured' properly, despite the baggage around this gear...
Apologies folks. I used to go round shows from one room of mediocre sound to the next, each one full of lavish looking and expensive boxes. th epal I was with commented on one occasion that most of this would be on the used lists for next to nothing a couple of years down the line - and he was largely right I remember...
Macca, I don't think amp design is a hidden science, just common sense where feedback and protection 'around' the circuit is concerned. Making for more power usually adds complexity and even more care is needed I gather from interesting past chats with people who really do know what they're doing. Do the power supplies right for rf as well as hum harmonics I gather and the rest can largely take care of itself unless you're designing for a particular sonic effect. I still love the Quad 606 family of amps, but was told in no uncertain terms that the need for 'current dumping' these days is unnecessary, as modern output devices are so much better. Quad proved this to themselves with the 77 and 99 power amps and a rather naughty large stereo power amp they did not long ago (can't remember what it was called now now), all conventional A/B designs and certainly the smaller models sounded great if the fitted caps were up to it (some Chinese 909's were Sh#t until the caps were replaced with more proper ones, but that's not a design fault).
|
|
|
Post by pauld on Feb 17, 2019 9:48:18 GMT
Dave I hate this type of Sh#t’o’gram post:
Have you actually heard any of this kit before saying that it doesn’t get the music flowing? Both Bel Canto and TAD, Belles and NovaFidelity that they sell are extremely musical.
The one thing that Coherent Systems are exceptionally good at, and by far better than any of those crappy more we’ll known dealers like KJ, Audio T and equiviant is getting a very non Hifi, musical sound.
Naim and Linn kit sounds completely broken in comparison.
In terms of cost, Bel Canto aren’t budget, but they aren’t super expensive
|
|
|
Post by macca on Feb 17, 2019 9:54:43 GMT
He does Bel Canto, Cabasse, Puresound, TAD, Quadral and Trichord, I'd say they are all known brands to anyone with an interest beyond budget kit. So, deluxe names and price tags with seemingly little to get the music flowing then (some Puresound is nice though but it's difficult to sell new these days)? All basically unknown outside the forums and Quadral were hardly musical speakers as I remember - all 'HiFi' fire and sharpness as I remember, a bit like Dyn-Audio. With stuff like that, no wonder you need all these add-on boxes to try to make it work in a satisfactory more 'human' fashion... All just my opinion and experiences of course and ymmv... I'm biting hard through gritted teeth, but *current* Linn and Naim probably has a hell of a lot more to offer in musical terms, such has their gear moved on. hell, even an expensive Linn streamer actually 'measured' properly, despite the baggage around this gear...
Apologies folks. I used to go round shows from one room of mediocre sound to the next, each one full of lavish looking and expensive boxes. th epal I was with commented on one occasion that most of this would be on the used lists for next to nothing a couple of years down the line - and he was largely right I remember...
Not this 'musical' thing again. That's just another marketing spiel like all the other marketing spiels. Yes they are 'deluxe' names but what is an independent dealer supposed to sell these days? Are they going to compete with Richer Sounds for a living? Good luck with that. Cabasse make very good speakers and TAD make good speakers and amps. Not heard any of the other brands but in any case I am sure they are all competent and anything beyond that is personal taste.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Feb 17, 2019 10:02:45 GMT
Yes I have. Have you heard any other MODERN gear that he DOESN'T sell?
If the sounds were as musical as you claim, then he'd not be making these add-on boxes because they wouldn't be necessary. You lived with your ES14/Exposure system for many years, yet how much and how often have you changed stuff in recent times eh? Maybe you've settled now, but you were chopping and changing for a while I recall.
You haven't heard modern Linn and Naim obviously, 'cos THESE DAYS, it ain't 'broken' as the Olive and CB stuff was and even the early post 2000 cosmetic stuff is bettered now.
I've not been into KJ for many years, but a trip there might be an eye opener for you as regards serious Top End purchased by the 'Oligarch' market. Hell, you can compare a Naim Statement amp with a top D'Agostino confection using an expensive DCS or Metronome digital source or the Kronos twin-opposing platter vinyl source at top LP12 money they do and which is claimed to sound amazing by any vinyl standards (I know the top LP12 and it's nothing remotely like the 80's sound they were getting) if you wanted to and that's 'proper' top end luxury.
You're too close to it all Paul and have bought almost totally into your favourite dealer's portfolio. As long as you enjoy the music you play at home and can ignore your stereo, then that's fine.
|
|
|
Post by macca on Feb 17, 2019 10:04:58 GMT
Unless, of course, there's unknown unknowns.... Which would explain why. Agree, we are a species are learning everyday so to say we know everything about anything now is naive. Of course we do not know everything about everything. What actually happens at the quantum level, what is dark matter and does it even exist? On the other side of the coin to suggest that there are huge gaps in our knowledge of audio science would also be naïve. It's not impossible that there are unknown unknowns in the fairly straightforward process of turning small changes in voltage into movements of air, but it is highly unlikely. If there is a grey area left in audio it is in psychoacoustics, how our brains interpret those air movements as music.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Feb 17, 2019 10:08:00 GMT
It's my experience that you can have a good clean 'sound' which leaves you emotionally cold. Even Quad had this with the Elite CD player/preamp they made once, the Artera range bringing the enjoyment back. One of my power amps here is a bit 'straight laced,' but it was known for it even then and can probably be explained by its high damping factor and distortion spectrum perhaps (although within its limits it still measures very well and better than many newer Top End confections it seems).
Independent dealers are having a hard time of it and so are certain chains too, one of which has been hanging by a thread for a few years now. No wonder these accessories at high prices crop up in an attempt to get some more cash flow..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2019 10:20:33 GMT
Agree, we are a species are learning everyday so to say we know everything about anything now is naive. Of course we do not know everything about everything. What actually happens at the quantum level, what is dark matter and does it even exist?On the other side of the coin to suggest that there are huge gaps in our knowledge of audio science would also be naïve. It's not impossible that there are unknown unknowns in the fairly straightforward process of turning small changes in voltage into movements of air, but it is highly unlikely. If there is a grey area left in audio it is in psychoacoustics, how our brains interpret those air movements as music. I'm glad somebody said something like this. It's obvious that we are still learning about everything. They still debate on how electricity actually works!
|
|
|
Post by macca on Feb 17, 2019 10:22:06 GMT
It's my experience that you can have a good clean 'sound' which leaves you emotionally cold. Mine too but its nothing to do with 'conveying the emotion', it's because the low level cues and ambient information are being smothered, creating a bland sound. It's a function of noise and distortion, it isn't a mystery.
|
|
|
Post by macca on Feb 17, 2019 10:24:46 GMT
Nothings unidentifiable if you've got access to a mass spectrometer. The typical piece of equipment any self respecting audiophile has lying around the home... I have a pal who works for a company that makes them. Not sure he would be amenable to testing things for me but I could always ask if and when I have access to them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2019 10:27:14 GMT
So all we need now is someone to fork out a huge lump,of cash on a box, break it open then convince a friend to analyse whatever is inside the box? Sounds simple.
|
|
|
Post by macca on Feb 17, 2019 10:43:33 GMT
So all we need now is someone to fork out a huge lump,of cash on a box, break it open then convince a friend to analyse whatever is inside the box? Sounds simple. Well, it's not impossible... BTW we do know that the Coherent box contains laminations of various metals as that much has been stated. We also know that the Entreq boxes contain some form of ground minerals, the infamous 'kitty litter', so clearly there is more than one way of skinning the cat (ho ho) in that regard.
|
|
|
Post by pauld on Feb 17, 2019 11:07:28 GMT
Agree, we are a species are learning everyday so to say we know everything about anything now is naive. Of course we do not know everything about everything. What actually happens at the quantum level, what is dark matter and does it even exist? On the other side of the coin to suggest that there are huge gaps in our knowledge of audio science would also be naïve. It's not impossible that there are unknown unknowns in the fairly straightforward process of turning small changes in voltage into movements of air, but it is highly unlikely. If there is a grey area left in audio it is in psychoacoustics, how our brains interpret those air movements as music. Agree with most of this, Martin. The reality is that whilst we may know a lot about the engineering aspects of Hifi we don’t understand why one person like one thing and another doesn’t. A good example for me being Magico and Costellation. People seem to fall over themselves for that stuff, but I prefer my 15 year old mini system, it is certainly a lot more musical to my ears.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2019 11:26:46 GMT
. My impression is they benefit from being fed from a good source and amplification. That's true of any speakers though.
I'd have thought that with an upward-firing main driver they would actually be more sympathetic to less than stellar sources and amps than a typical speaker.
The tweeter fires forward and reveals a lot of detail. An area were a poor source is going to be obvious. I think the lack of crossover is likely responsible. Apart from restricted lower bass they make other speakers I have appear to put a blanket over the sound to some degree. Also need more gain on the volume knob than medium floorstanders of 90db (claimed) efficiency. Of course NVA don't provide measurements. Bass and scale is otherwise surprising for such a small cabinet.
|
|
|
Post by macca on Feb 17, 2019 11:49:43 GMT
Of course we do not know everything about everything. What actually happens at the quantum level, what is dark matter and does it even exist? On the other side of the coin to suggest that there are huge gaps in our knowledge of audio science would also be naïve. It's not impossible that there are unknown unknowns in the fairly straightforward process of turning small changes in voltage into movements of air, but it is highly unlikely. If there is a grey area left in audio it is in psychoacoustics, how our brains interpret those air movements as music. Agree with most of this, Martin. The reality is that whilst we may know a lot about the engineering aspects of Hifi we don’t understand why one person like one thing and another doesn’t. A good example for me being Magico and Costellation. People seem to fall over themselves for that stuff, but I prefer my 15 year old mini system, it is certainly a lot more musical to my ears. Yes, was listening to a very expensive system with a friend a few months back now. Just the cartridge was ten grand! He couldn't get enough of it, I wouldn't have been able to live with it for long. All down to personal taste. The really naïve people are those who insist that there is only one true way to good sound.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2019 11:53:59 GMT
Agree, we are a species are learning everyday so to say we know everything about anything now is naive. Of course we do not know everything about everything. What actually happens at the quantum level, what is dark matter and does it even exist? On the other side of the coin to suggest that there are huge gaps in our knowledge of audio science would also be naïve. It's not impossible that there are unknown unknowns in the fairly straightforward process of turning small changes in voltage into movements of air, but it is highly unlikely. If there is a grey area left in audio it is in psychoacoustics, how our brains interpret those air movements as music. Well, there are some who hold the view that we don't know "all" there is to know with regards audio design. Take for example the designer - we're not talking fireside forum experts, Martin. Not suggesting anything personal by that, by the way - who has designed gear for decades including for some hi-end American brands and at 80+ been round the audio block a few times, who holds the the view that active preamps are preferable to passive. He can't, even after decades of experience, give a rational, technical reason why it should be. In theory, a passive is as simple as it gets, so, in theory, should sound best, all things considered. On the the other hand, an active preamp obviously has more components in the signal path, plus you have distortion, noise and power considerations to take into account. In theory then, active preamp should come-off second best. And course he's not unique in holding the view. He also has a bit of an unusual view about "music" being "conveyed" by a piece of electronic apparatus. Interesting bloke to listen to.
|
|
|
Post by nonuffin on Feb 17, 2019 12:02:13 GMT
He does Bel Canto, Cabasse, Puresound, TAD, Quadral and Trichord, I'd say they are all known brands to anyone with an interest beyond budget kit. All basically unknown outside the forums and Quadral were hardly musical speakers as I remember - all 'HiFi' fire and sharpness as I remember, a bit like Dyn-Audio.
Your memory of Quadral speakers may have been valid back then Dave, but the current crop is worlds away from that. I own a pair of Chromium Style 6 speakers and they are truly superb, easily seeing off speakers many times the price, in fact they thrashed a pair of floorstanders twice their size and no less than 3 times their price last week.
|
|
|
Post by macca on Feb 17, 2019 12:36:32 GMT
Of course we do not know everything about everything. What actually happens at the quantum level, what is dark matter and does it even exist? On the other side of the coin to suggest that there are huge gaps in our knowledge of audio science would also be naïve. It's not impossible that there are unknown unknowns in the fairly straightforward process of turning small changes in voltage into movements of air, but it is highly unlikely. If there is a grey area left in audio it is in psychoacoustics, how our brains interpret those air movements as music. Well, there are some who hold the view that we don't know "all" there is to know with regards audio design. Take for example the designer - we're not talking fireside forum experts, Martin. Not suggesting anything personal by that, by the way - who has designed gear for decades including for some hi-end American brands and at 80+ been round the audio block a few times, who holds the the view that active preamps are preferable to passive. He can't, even after decades of experience, give a rational, technical reason why it should be. In theory, a passive is as simple as it gets, so, in theory, should sound best, all things considered. On the the other hand, an active preamp obviously has more components in the signal path, plus you have distortion, noise and power considerations to take into account. In theory then, active preamp should come-off second best. And course he's not unique in holding the view. He also has a bit of an unusual view about "music" being "conveyed" by a piece of electronic apparatus. Interesting bloke to listen to. Yes I've seen that interview, it is interesting. Isn't the active/passive thing more of a personal taste issue though? As oppose to being a technical conundrum I mean.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Feb 17, 2019 13:14:09 GMT
All basically unknown outside the forums and Quadral were hardly musical speakers as I remember - all 'HiFi' fire and sharpness as I remember, a bit like Dyn-Audio.
Your memory of Quadral speakers may have been valid back then Dave, but the current crop is worlds away from that. I own a pair of Chromium Style 6 speakers and they are truly superb, easily seeing off speakers many times the price, in fact they thrashed a pair of floorstanders twice their size and no less than 3 times their price last week. You didn't say what speakers they trounced, but glad if they're now sorted. They weren't a very few years ago I recall (less than ten).
Would be interesting to compare them with the boring (in pictures) looking Spendor A6 (I don't believe modern Spendors are slush-boxes any more since derek Hughes left), oddball Rega RX3, Revel Concerta2 F35 and stand-mount ATC 12's? I don't look so fondly at ribbons I'm afraid, as matching to cones can be a minefield depending on dispersion and the room they're in.
|
|