Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,399
|
Post by Bigman80 on Jul 13, 2018 15:16:38 GMT
Valve amps have always fascinated me. They look gorigeous in most casss and somehow give you a greater desire to switch them on and listen, especially at night. That warm glow is seductive in itself.
The best ones have been good in all areas and great in terms of air, space, silkiness and intimacy. The worst ones have been thin and weedy, or just “pipe and slippers”. Bass is generally a bit softer than SS and impact is usually played down, but not always.
I have often greatly enjoyed valve amps but eventually switched back to solid state for more impact. Then I missed the air and space. My current amp is probably as close to valve strengths as you will find from an SS model. Maybe that’s why it has stayed with me. The closest a valve amp has come to being all things to all men was my mk1 Audion Sterling running KT90s.
Anyone else out there fascinated by valves but not committed fully to them? Any valve doubters or devotees? Or do you think it depends totally on the amp and there is no such thing as a valve or SS sound.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2018 15:21:42 GMT
i bought a yarqin tube amp a few years ago..tried it for an hour or two and then tried it again a year later. utter junk..put me off tubes for life..they claim warm sounding lol..harsh weak sound..me 3 onkyo av amps wipe the floor with it..so does my av pioneer ax10i sitting in me cupboard.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2018 16:52:29 GMT
I've used various valve or transistor amplifiers as long as I can remember and still can't say I have a preference.
I had Leak and Rogers valve amps in the seventies, when they were regarded as 'old hat', then moved to a solid state Quantum pre/power set-up, followed by an Audio Concepts P300 'Legend' MOSFET beast of a power amp that I kept for many years. Went back to a Leak Stereo 20 for a while.
I've used various others of both types since and have no preference. They can sound different and both be good.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Jul 13, 2018 18:16:31 GMT
I have a Croft rebuilt set of Quad II's (I don't regard them as technically mine, so don't feel I can sell them). They're glorious - gloriously coloured, but used with a Croft preamp, they sounded wonderful into vintage early spec Quad 57's as well as Epos 14's - Naim A5 was the preferred speaker cable too, but it only cost a fiver a metre then... Glenn's own series 5 power amp was very good too, but my gawd there's some effin' tat out there in the market, which badly designed, not always reliable and has a very noticeable effect on the speakers used - probably why people hear many of these differences... A Radford STA25 I had forty years ago when it was around twelve years old, needed its leaky supply caps changing and it sounded no better than a Naim 160 (it must have been faulty then ). Thirty years ago, the Audio Innovations 500 was a favourite amp and it sounded like you'd put a blanket over the speakers. Worked with tizzy pro-Acs though I remember and the oval shaped 300 was similar I remember, like a valve version of yer average soft toned and slightly gutless MF A1...
|
|
|
Post by nonuffin on Jul 13, 2018 19:11:06 GMT
Having suffered 30+ degree heat for the past couple of weeks I am jolly glad I don't have a bottle amp adding to the heat thank you very much.
I bought a Beard valve power amp a few years ago and the feckin thing drove me nuts going %TINK*TINK*TINK* for almost an hour while it was warming up and the same again cooling down after it was switched off.
The big difference for me though between SS and toobs is cost. I have bought my Lyngdorf power amp and that is it, whereas a new set of bottles can cost left arm/right leg sort of money when they expire and rolling the bloody things for nominal sound gains to me is a waste of money. People spend countless hours squabbling about cable differences, but never a cross word said about differences in valve sound. Us audiophools need looking at for sanity shortfalls.
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,399
|
Post by Bigman80 on Jul 13, 2018 19:29:04 GMT
My Sonneteer kicks out as much heat as many valve amps. Great in Winter but in 34 degree heat right now, I could do without it. I do wonder about the effect of heat on the perceived sound of an amp. All the physically warm ones have sounded warmer and better as they heat up,
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2018 19:31:40 GMT
I read in some places the bigger brother Alabaster runs hotter than Campion.
S.
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,399
|
Post by Bigman80 on Jul 13, 2018 19:38:52 GMT
Me too. My Campion is about the same as an A1 so the Alabaster must be really hotl
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2018 19:42:36 GMT
Me too. My Campion is about the same as an A1 so the Alabaster must be really hotl WHAT!!! You are joking, right? The Campion I had, ran just slightly warm. Perhaps I didn't push it much? S.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2018 22:08:30 GMT
I have had not had the experience of many of you on here with amps. In my price range for a pre/power combo I found SS amps to be a bit harsh at the top. I do not suppose you would have this problem with decent SS amps. I have had a NAD pre/power combo, a Cambridge Audio cxa60 integrated and an Arcam P75 in the last year or so. They were harsh, except the Arcam which was dull. I now feed my old Quad 99 with a Chinese Little Dot Mk IV preamp and it was just what I was looking for - sweet highs and mids, for my ears at least. Bit lacking on the bass perhaps and lacks a little attack but has weight without being forward. For the money, the Little Dot was a good bargain and I would not know how to get more bang for my buck without shelling out quite a bit more than the £750 I paid for this amp combo.
But not all valve amps sound this laid back. My friend has a very forward valve preamp which he found tiring to listen to until he changed his cabling.
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,399
|
Post by Bigman80 on Jul 14, 2018 4:02:52 GMT
Me too. My Campion is about the same as an A1 so the Alabaster must be really hotl WHAT!!! You are joking, right? The Campion I had, ran just slightly warm. Perhaps I didn't push it much? S. I think that one might not have been on song. It didn’t have the sparkle that thismien does. This one and the one I paired it with run hotter.
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,399
|
Post by Bigman80 on Jul 14, 2018 4:10:09 GMT
I have had not had the experience of many of you on here with amps. In my price range for a pre/power combo I found SS amps to be a bit harsh at the top. I do not suppose you would have this problem with decent SS amps. I have had a NAD pre/power combo, a Cambridge Audio cxa60 integrated and an Arcam P75 in the last year or so. They were harsh, except the Arcam which was dull. I now feed my old Quad 99 with a Chinese Little Dot Mk IV preamp and it was just what I was looking for - sweet highs and mids, for my ears at least. Bit lacking on the bass perhaps and lacks a little attack but has weight without being forward. For the money, the Little Dot was a good bargain and I would not know how to get more bang for my buck without shelling out quite a bit more than the £750 I paid for this amp combo. But not all valve amps sound this laid back. My friend has a very forward valve preamp which he found tiring to listen to until he changed his cabling.
Lots of people, seem to like the combo of valve preamp and SS power amp. I don’t have a great deal,of experience there mysel because I have tended to use integrateds.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Jul 14, 2018 9:31:22 GMT
I have had not had the experience of many of you on here with amps. In my price range for a pre/power combo I found SS amps to be a bit harsh at the top. I do not suppose you would have this problem with decent SS amps. I have had a NAD pre/power combo, a Cambridge Audio cxa60 integrated and an Arcam P75 in the last year or so. They were harsh, except the Arcam which was dull. I now feed my old Quad 99 with a Chinese Little Dot Mk IV preamp and it was just what I was looking for - sweet highs and mids, for my ears at least. Bit lacking on the bass perhaps and lacks a little attack but has weight without being forward. For the money, the Little Dot was a good bargain and I would not know how to get more bang for my buck without shelling out quite a bit more than the £750 I paid for this amp combo.
But not all valve amps sound this laid back. My friend has a very forward valve preamp which he found tiring to listen to until he changed his cabling.
Harshness in a wide variety of ss amps indicates to me a speaker harshness problem, not always an amp issue. CD's introduction was a killer for many amps and speakers as they were challenged far more than in the vinyl days...
You should try a Quad 77 preamp - as sweet as a nut and with air and space not there in the 34 and 44 models I remember. By inference, the 99 preamp is similar as I understand it was the remote site that was changed rather than the rest of it at the time...
I have to give a kind-of plug for NVA solid state here, as the one thing in all the NVA's I've heard now is a TOTAL lack of grain or edge, but with none of the sluggish or 'altered' bass a transformer coupled amp can introduce with some speakers. No 'creaming off' of trumpet rasps and so on, but a basic purity and lack of 'hash' that appeals to my ears anyway, very much in the vein of a good valve amp that isn't stomping its character all over the recordings played (macca, you ought to try one of the bigger ones at some point, just to confirm my suggestions made in an earlier thread about baby amps vs bigger amps )
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2018 11:03:00 GMT
I much prefer the rose tinted warm sound of valves to the cold clinical sound of SS.
If you know what I mean !!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2018 11:26:57 GMT
I have had not had the experience of many of you on here with amps. In my price range for a pre/power combo I found SS amps to be a bit harsh at the top. I do not suppose you would have this problem with decent SS amps. I have had a NAD pre/power combo, a Cambridge Audio cxa60 integrated and an Arcam P75 in the last year or so. They were harsh, except the Arcam which was dull. I now feed my old Quad 99 with a Chinese Little Dot Mk IV preamp and it was just what I was looking for - sweet highs and mids, for my ears at least. Bit lacking on the bass perhaps and lacks a little attack but has weight without being forward. For the money, the Little Dot was a good bargain and I would not know how to get more bang for my buck without shelling out quite a bit more than the £750 I paid for this amp combo.
But not all valve amps sound this laid back. My friend has a very forward valve preamp which he found tiring to listen to until he changed his cabling.
Harshness in a wide variety of ss amps indicates to me a speaker harshness problem, not always an amp issue. CD's introduction was a killer for many amps and speakers as they were challenged far more than in the vinyl days...
You should try a Quad 77 preamp - as sweet as a nut and with air and space not there in the 34 and 44 models I remember. By inference, the 99 preamp is similar as I understand it was the remote site that was changed rather than the rest of it at the time...
I have to give a kind-of plug for NVA solid state here, as the one thing in all the NVA's I've heard now is a TOTAL lack of grain or edge, but with none of the sluggish or 'altered' bass a transformer coupled amp can introduce with some speakers. No 'creaming off' of trumpet rasps and so on, but a basic purity and lack of 'hash' that appeals to my ears anyway, very much in the vein of a good valve amp that isn't stomping its character all over the recordings played (macca, you ought to try one of the bigger ones at some point, just to confirm my suggestions made in an earlier thread about baby amps vs bigger amps ) I hear what you are saying - the guy who sold me the Quad said I should try the the 99 preamp.
The pre amp I own may well be putting its stamp on the sound - but if so, it is a pleasing one, to my ears at least. And that may even be a subject for an entirely different thread: is it true and perfect reproduction you are after? Or is it what you think it should sound like?
If I were into orchestral music or jazz or big band music, and experienced that live music on a regular basis, I would be wanting to recreate the sound of a live performance. However, the stuff I listen to is a manufactured studio recording with effects, artificial panning, doubled vocals, reverb - you name it. It is art, but you realise how much it is "manufactured" when you see bands trying to perform this kind of stuff live - eg The Smiths attempting "How Soon is Now?" or Queen playing a recording of the "Galileo" sequence in Bohemian Rhapsody and not even being on stage, to name but two.
It is the sound I get presented with that matters to me - and it is a bit hit and miss how the components will "sit" together (in my limited experience).
My brother used to play drums and I know how they really sound - there are few recordings that even come close, let alone HiFi systems reproducing that sound that I have heard. I wish even the Zildjian crash cymbals were not as "trashy" in real life to be honest.
I don't really care which amps I use - valve or SS, but so far, this valve setup gives me what I am happy with, even if it is not a true reproduction of the original. My crash cymbals are nicer thanthe real thing!
Don't we all do that?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2018 11:27:55 GMT
my yarqin tube amp is harsh as fek...cant use the thing
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2018 11:31:36 GMT
Obviously a synergy miss match with your Bose speakers......😁
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2018 11:35:00 GMT
got 10 sets of speakers here mucker..still crap..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2018 11:37:47 GMT
Can't you just simply put it in a time capsule (Tupperware box) and bury it for future generations to discover. That would be the sensible thing to do.
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,399
|
Post by Bigman80 on Jul 14, 2018 11:47:15 GMT
I agree with Snowdog. If it works for you then that’s all that matters. Also there are loads of grain-free and harshness-free SS amps apart from NVA. Personally I don’t regard them as anything unusual or special in that regard. I would agree they are lacking such nasties though.
Just recently I had a John Shearne amp which was really smooth, almost velvety. My Sonneteer also surpasses any NVA I’be had had for clarity and shows not a hint of grain or harshness. A bit too load back for me, but Albarry are also lacking in any such traits. Dave and I disagree on the Sugden A21a but I find it clear, smooth and open. The SE version is even better. My mate had an Audio Analogue,,which again was sweet, clear and open, with no grain. Just a few examples, but I believe there are many, many SS amps that will deliver in this respect.......and I have still to hear so many.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2018 11:57:37 GMT
Yep true Andrew......NVA is far from unique in this regard and is bettered by many SS amps out there on sound quality, although the NVA must be commended for being so cheap.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Jul 14, 2018 12:09:11 GMT
Over to you sir really 'The real thing' sonically in ones listening room would be too much to take for long I reckon and if your combination gets you investigating more and more music, then who the eff am I to say otherwise? I just remember that when the Quad rep brought round the 77 integrated (unloved ergonomically and still a bargain used), i heard a wondrous sweet and delightfully *musical* presentation I'd not heard from Quad since the 22/II days. the 77 preamp built on this and offered a bloody good phono stage too. back in 2001, I bought a supposedly 'used' one from a dealer on my travels for £175, the intention being a second system, fully boxed and mint with remote, but the box was too big when we moved in addition to the clocks I'd lumbered myself with (another Sh#t story), so I sold it at small profit, only realising my mistake later when I discovered the main preamp, now a Bryston BP25 as it was cheaper than the big ATC I'd just sold, needed 24 hours to fully come on song (it sounded stark and almost clinically 'accurate' for the first few hours - and I didn't leave it powered 24/7 as I should have done possibly). Looking back, the ATC preamp was probably better for music 'from cold' and the 77 preamp definitely so, as the BP25 came to this musical level after twelve hours at least. The BP26 separated the gain blocks in terms of power supplies and the power supply was enlarged and placed in a full width matching case - the price doubled! - so maybe the sound was better from the off perhaps? I have to give a shout to Glenn Croft again, as his Micro 25 preamp is as tonally honest as any good solid state preamp, properly drives power amps that don't like a passive driving them without hum (the Crowns I love for example) and yet is a reliable long lived all-valve design at moderate price for a hand made item sold through dealers... the 25R and RS are merely a genuine musical refinement on the excellent basic design, not what I'd call a major eye-opener in terms of sonic fireworks - in my opinion obviously...
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Jul 14, 2018 12:11:26 GMT
I heard two Sugdens a few years ago at my pal dave's place. One looked cheaper than the other and sounded horrible - thick, clogged and downright dull!!! the other had neat metal inset 'buttons' between the main controls and this one sounded lovely in comparison. Westie, i'll see if I took any pics of them at the time and forward them on for you to identify...
I've found the pics - the one I disliked was the A21a mk2 (2007 - 2014) and the one I did like was the '21SE' model, heard in 2011 or thereabouts judging by the pic dates.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2018 12:24:01 GMT
I much prefer the rose tinted warm sound of valves to the cold clinical sound of SS. If you know what I mean !!!Not really. There is no specific valve or solid state sound. That idea is largely a misconception. A good amplifier should not have a 'signature' that denotes what type of design it is. If you can, try and get a listen to a Creek Destiny 2 amplifier, If you didn't know what you were listening to, you simply would not be able to say whether is employed valves or transistors.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Jul 14, 2018 12:48:31 GMT
On the other tack, I'd suggest a listen to the larger Icon valve amps with KT120's fitted, or possibly one of the Pathos designs (Inpol 2 and Classic Remix I think it was). Not in the slightest a valvey sound, but the latter make is Hybrid I believe...
I recently read a review from HFW of a hybrid amp that turns it on it's head - solid state drivers and transformer coupled valve output stage. None of the transformer overload it seemed and sound and basic measurements like a transistor based amp. Cost a bit for a forty watt amp though...
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,399
|
Post by Bigman80 on Jul 14, 2018 13:23:29 GMT
Over to you sir really 'The real thing' sonically in ones listening room would be too much to take for long I reckon and if your combination gets you investigating more and more music, then who the eff am I to say otherwise? I just remember that when the Quad rep brought round the 77 integrated (unloved ergonomically and still a bargain used), i heard a wondrous sweet and delightfully *musical* presentation I'd not heard from Quad since the 22/II days. the 77 preamp built on this and offered a bloody good phono stage too. back in 2001, I bought a supposedly 'used' one from a dealer on my travels for £175, the intention being a second system, fully boxed and mint with remote, but the box was too big when we moved in addition to the clocks I'd lumbered myself with (another Sh#t story), so I sold it at small profit, only realising my mistake later when I discovered the main preamp, now a Bryston BP25 as it was cheaper than the big ATC I'd just sold, needed 24 hours to fully come on song (it sounded stark and almost clinically 'accurate' for the first few hours - and I didn't leave it powered 24/7 as I should have done possibly). Looking back, the ATC preamp was probably better for music 'from cold' and the 77 preamp definitely so, as the BP25 came to this musical level after twelve hours at least. The BP26 separated the gain blocks in terms of power supplies and the power supply was enlarged and placed in a full width matching case - the price doubled! - so maybe the sound was better from the off perhaps? I have to give a shout to Glenn Croft again, as his Micro 25 preamp is as tonally honest as any good solid state preamp, properly drives power amps that don't like a passive driving them without hum (the Crowns I love for example) and yet is a reliable long lived all-valve design at moderate price for a hand made item sold through dealers... the 25R and RS are merely a genuine musical refinement on the excellent basic design, not what I'd call a major eye-opener in terms of sonic fireworks - in my opinion obviously... I SO wish I’d had the chance to try Croft. I’ve even bought a preamp and a power amp off EBay. The seller pulled out of the preamp sale and the courier messed up delivery of the power amp. My mates have had Croft and loved it. Always regretted selling, too. They always say it’s flawed but wonderful, but if you don’t experience it, you can’t really know what they mean, the thing is, I’m settled now and I probably will never know. But you have to stop somewhere.
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,399
|
Post by Bigman80 on Jul 14, 2018 13:39:16 GMT
I heard two Sugdens a few years ago at my pal dave's place. One looked cheaper than the other and sounded horrible - thick, clogged and downright dull!!! the other had neat metal inset 'buttons' between the main controls and this one sounded lovely in comparison. Westie, i'll see if I took any pics of them at the time and forward them on for you to identify... I've found the pics - the one I disliked was the A21a mk2 (2007 - 2014) and the one I did like was the '21SE' model, heard in 2011 or thereabouts judging by the pic dates.
That’s interesting, I often wonder about various specimens of amps giving different results, and then there are various incarnations. I’ve had my hands on two A21a Mk1s (the titanium fascia jobbies) and an a21se (later model). Both the A21as were nothing like I had imagined. I’d expected warm and wooly amd a bit pipe and slippers. Instead they were both lucid, clear and revealing. Shane once said they had no sense of humour amd I got what he meant. There was no romance, no added verve and no extras. It was a very pared down sound that left you feeling there was as close to nothing in the way as you were likely to find. I really respected the sound and was very tempted to keep the amp. The SE I had a few months later seemed to add some extra verve, poise, sparkle and grace. It sounded like it had better power supply provision because it was a bit more sure-footed. I bought that amp as a favour to someone overseas because nobody would ship to him. I couldn’t keep it for long but it was a wonderful amp that I would own again in a heartbeat. It left me realising the original Sugden was a tad mechanical in comparison.
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,399
|
Post by Bigman80 on Jul 14, 2018 13:40:57 GMT
I much prefer the rose tinted warm sound of valves to the cold clinical sound of SS. If you know what I mean !!!Not really. There is no specific valve or solid state sound. That idea is largely a misconception. A good amplifier should not have a 'signature' that denotes what type of design it is. If you can, try and get a listen to a Creek Destiny 2 amplifier, If you didn't know what you were listening to, you simply would not be able to say whether is employed valves or transistors. I have only heard the various 4040 Andy 4140 models. I’m guessing the Peter models are very different,
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2018 14:23:02 GMT
EL34s are my output tube of choice.
You can keep your KTs & RBs I'm afraid.
I don't know, perhaps they have a signature sound.!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2018 15:12:40 GMT
I like some valve amps but I often think they are expensive far what they are. You can get a low power transistor integrated for a lot less than a low power valve integrated. Unless you buy chinese that is. Often the supplied valves ara average at best, which means more expense. Then they wear out.
They can sound really nice, so I get why some people decide it is worth it. Sound per pound is an uphill battle though.
|
|