Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,400
Member is Online
|
Post by Bigman80 on May 12, 2024 8:46:23 GMT
lol...No nails of any length! And if there were they'd have been 4" CCC Copper
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,400
Member is Online
|
Post by Bigman80 on May 12, 2024 21:03:31 GMT
Today is the first day I've missed having the X50D, or any streamer really.
Whilst ploughing through a few CDs, which sounded fab btw, I had the urge to listen to some Steely Dan. As it happens, I don't have Steely Dan on CD, so £35 later I have the four disc box set on the way.
In the meantime I thought I'd have a listen to some jazz. The album I had in mind Is also absent from my CD collection. I didn't buy it but did check the cost.
I then decided to have a look for some other CDs I know I haven't got, and it appears that the second hand CD market is starting to creep up in price. A few weeks back I could have got 30 CDs for £35, now they are back up to £4-5 per album.
It wasn't lost on me that £35 gets me Quboz for three months and all the Steely Dan anyone could want, albeit at a lesser (IMO) SQ than CD, nor was it lost on me that I now own those CDs forever, but still, collecting CDs is suddenly looking like it's gonna be more expensive than I planned.
Maybe I need to rethink this plan a bit.
|
|
|
Post by brucew268 on May 12, 2024 22:08:13 GMT
Today is the first day I've missed having the X50D, or any streamer really. Whilst ploughing through a few CDs, which sounded fab btw, I had the urge to listen to some Steely Dan. As it happens, I don't have Steely Dan on CD, so £35 later I have the four disc box set on the way. In the meantime I thought I'd have a listen to some jazz. The album I had in mind Is also absent from my CD collection. I didn't buy it but did check the cost. I then decided to have a look for some other CDs I know I haven't got, and it appears that the second hand CD market is starting to creep up in price. A few weeks back I could have got 30 CDs for £35, now they are back up to £4-5 per album. It wasn't lost on me that £35 gets me Quboz for three months and all the Steely Dan anyone could want, albeit at a lesser (IMO) SQ than CD, nor was it lost on me that I now own those CDs forever, but still, collecting CDs is suddenly looking like it's gonna be more expensive than I planned. Maybe I need to rethink this plan a bit. There is that whole question of whether instant gratification is a net positive or negative for quality of life, or whether delayed gratification is good for character and the quality of the pleasure!
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,400
Member is Online
|
Post by Bigman80 on May 12, 2024 22:12:35 GMT
Today is the first day I've missed having the X50D, or any streamer really. Whilst ploughing through a few CDs, which sounded fab btw, I had the urge to listen to some Steely Dan. As it happens, I don't have Steely Dan on CD, so £35 later I have the four disc box set on the way. In the meantime I thought I'd have a listen to some jazz. The album I had in mind Is also absent from my CD collection. I didn't buy it but did check the cost. I then decided to have a look for some other CDs I know I haven't got, and it appears that the second hand CD market is starting to creep up in price. A few weeks back I could have got 30 CDs for £35, now they are back up to £4-5 per album. It wasn't lost on me that £35 gets me Quboz for three months and all the Steely Dan anyone could want, albeit at a lesser (IMO) SQ than CD, nor was it lost on me that I now own those CDs forever, but still, collecting CDs is suddenly looking like it's gonna be more expensive than I planned. Maybe I need to rethink this plan a bit. There is that whole question of whether instant gratification is a net positive or negative for quality of life, or whether delayed gratification is good for character and the quality of the pleasure! It's a good point. Finding myself wanting everything 🤣
|
|
|
Post by bencat on May 13, 2024 0:05:03 GMT
I can only feel your pain Oli I have been collecting cd,s for over thirty years and now have a very decent collection but most were bought when used meant less than three pounds a CD . As you mention the market has moved and prices for used cd,s are rising all the time . Luckily I kept all those I bought and ripped them to hard drive and play from that . I have tried the cd replay compared to the Flac version and I found no difference I could hear from one to the other . I know others say different but not for me tried it and sorry I am old and maybe cloth eared but could not tell the difference . Very recently I decided to try Tidal and I have to put my hand up and say playing the same song from Tidal and my Flac version I could not tell the difference .
|
|
|
Post by antonio on May 13, 2024 5:13:07 GMT
We can't tell the difference either Andrew, neither can we when playing a cd vs streaming. Played a cd a couple of days ago, first in I don't know how long, and strangely enough, yesterday I was going to buy 3 Gert Emmens cd's from Bandcamp. They were going to cost approx £14 more than the digital downloads, got to the checkout, I thought shipping charges would be grouped, no another £17 was to be charged. Removed cd's from trolley and went for the digital downloads, now on the internal storage of the Eversolo and K50.
|
|
|
Post by macca on May 13, 2024 6:00:41 GMT
I got lots of CDs I paid top whack for in the 1990s.
How about G&R 'Use your Illusion' I and II? I paid £19.99 each!
That's almost forty quid each in today's money. So I don't complain about paying four quid an album now, although it's usually a bit less than that.
Renting music just feels intrinsically wrong to me but I agree it's probably cheaper if you like a lot of different stuff, all the time.
|
|
|
Post by jandl100 on May 13, 2024 7:49:25 GMT
Streaming / owning the hardcopy. I dont think there's a significant audible difference. Well, kind of. Different cdps definitely sound different, so maybe it's fun if you can choose your preferred deviation from neutral. For me it all comes down to listening habits. If you want to mostly play the same recordings over and over, then owning the discs seems sensible. If you're into new recordings and exploration in a big way, then streaming is simply a dream come true.
|
|
optical
Moderator
BIG STAR
Be Excellent To Eachother
Posts: 1,624
|
Post by optical on May 13, 2024 8:32:30 GMT
For me it's not so 'black and white' and there is another camp (which I may well be in by myself by the sounds of it . . . ).
I'm not really sure I get (or like) the 'polarising' of both camps from the other?
I have a core of stuff I play fairly regulary (maybe 50 albums or so, possibly more) but in the last couple of weeks I've downloaded (not available on CD or vinyl) probably another 50 albums, (most of them free actually).
Having tried *streaming* (from internet) I just couldn't get on with it, some stuff available, some not (platform dependant), some changing of what's available from week to week . . . that's mental if you ask me.
I still technically *stream*, just from an SSD on-board storage (yes I know I've mentioned this before) but it sounds quite superior to the other definition of *streaming*. Just doesn't have that depth and nuance I get with playing off a hard drive. I concede maybe if I looked at optimising everything else in the chain, router, ethernet cables or wifi tweaks, maybe that would change, but even though I'm more than willing to explore most avenues of hifi, it's just too much hassle for me, I'd actually draw the line at that I think. hmmm . . . surprised myself there actually.
I guess we all have our own methods but I'm happy with mine, which is:
- Listen to lots of new music on Youtube/bandcamp etc to wittle down what I really REALLY want to listen to.
- Buy it, download it and put it on my SSD in my streamer.
- Listen on the main system (which is a thrill in itself to hear how much better it sounds to me).
Knowing that not all music is available to every platform, I just wouldn't know which ones to subscribe to for fear of losing out. Okay so I have some weird tastes (which aren't available on any of the mainstream platforms, I've checked!) so my method works well for me.
I think there is flexibility to be found and pro's to all approaches actually and it's just what works best in your circumstances.
|
|
|
Post by jandl100 on May 13, 2024 8:49:27 GMT
I agree, there's no right or wrong, just what works best for you at a particular period in time.
I've 2,000 CDs stacked neatly and alphabetically on shelves. They never get played these days.
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,400
Member is Online
|
Post by Bigman80 on May 13, 2024 10:43:51 GMT
I got lots of CDs I paid top whack for in the 1990s. How about G&R 'Use your Illusion' I and II? I paid £19.99 each! That's almost forty quid each in today's money. So I don't complain about paying four quid an album now, although it's usually a bit less than that. Renting music just feels intrinsically wrong to me but I agree it's probably cheaper if you like a lot of different stuff, all the time. I think I'm looking at it from a scale of "look how many I need to buy" rather than "£4 is peanuts" approach. I think some sort of streaming device from a SSD until I have the CDs I want may be an idea, even if it's just HQ player from my laptop. Now there's an idea!
|
|
|
Post by bencat on May 13, 2024 11:47:20 GMT
I know it is a bit basic but I have a Raspberry Pi4 with Picoreplayer on it if you want to try that ?
|
|
|
Post by misterc on May 13, 2024 12:26:54 GMT
Here, CD's sound good even on a £600 player these days. Streaming imho very hit & miss, a quality switch and minor cabling make the differences here for IP supplied music. FBA still rules the roost here by a more than fair margin. Last I strapped in an Esoteric K01 I have been working on and compared the CD/SACD and it's own internal dac via streaming & FBA I deliberately do not use any clocking to start with.
In a straight level match the CD performance was imho more than match for all of Qoboz 24/192Khz files compared to the NON treated CD's one or two were slightly better, I tried 12 tracks right across the genre's. CD won by a small margin. SACD's very interesting as many of the Sony examples were very cleverly mixed for dsd bias, that said the upper Frequencies were clearly improved over Qoboz, not everything was that obvious, would say a very narrow win for SACD, bit it was very marginal.
Next up Spotify in the mix, again on some tracks spotify was just more together and enjoyable, its felt more real, not as detailed or quite as punchy but more listenable imho and the album choice involved far less remasters as well!
Lastly digital file replay, honestly its just so much more palpable, real far greater depth and texture, bass is way Taugher and more articulate, but the greatest obvious trait was it was way more relaxed and fluid, yet dynamics were actually improved where they were required. Then switching in the clocks deliveries the sort of SQ I get on a daily basis more than vinyl challenging.
I was using the N20 Aurender streamer/server as a source/ Esoteric K-01 as payer/dac, Liquid Music III mono blocks and matching pre amplifier now V3 and the Tad E1-Tx's IP side wise, a dedicated 5G mobile router with 12Vdc QP-2 a Silent Angel Bonn N8 pro switch powered by the other rail in the QP-2 plus re-clocked by the SE-120
Using the clocks made the the streaming services way more enjoyable and natural, the CD too stepped its game up well, what I would say at this point the difference between high Rez Qoboz & the CD pretty much disappeared, although I still feel that CD is more palapbe than the streaming services currently although HR Qoboz delivers perceptible more detail.
As with all these things in audio YMMV, just thought I would share the findings from last week’s little exercise
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,400
Member is Online
|
Post by Bigman80 on May 13, 2024 13:35:37 GMT
I know it is a bit basic but I have a Raspberry Pi4 with Picoreplayer on it if you want to try that ? I appreciate the offer, but I'll pass thanks. The laptop is one of the new Samsung Book things, which after a little reading suggests can be more than adequate if configured correctly. I am looking for a Mercury V2 streamer, but have enquired as to the difference between MK2 and MK3 versions.
|
|
|
Post by lurch on May 13, 2024 15:08:50 GMT
A Wiim Pro at <£150 with a 5v LPS would be an ideal solution, will read NAS & run Qobuz etc. They really are surprisingly good, I have one in System 2 with Chifi LPS feeding a Caimen SEG (with SEG50 upgrade chip) at £385 all in, it has no right to sound as good. Ethernet via powerline adapter and used Zyxel switch & 2nd feed from the Chifi LPS.
|
|
|
Post by alit on May 13, 2024 18:43:22 GMT
Was going to suggest a WP also, use it for finding the music you want to buy on physical media.
|
|
|
Post by mikeyb on May 14, 2024 7:49:39 GMT
Wiim won't cut it for Oli I don't think, the Mercury V2 would slay it I expect. Ok the Wiim would be fine as a temp measure but that's not the goal.
Not seen a Mercury V2 on the used market but I'll keep an eye out.
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,400
Member is Online
|
Post by Bigman80 on May 14, 2024 9:20:44 GMT
Yup, my priority is cheap but excellent performance, which the Pi2AES should achieve.
|
|
|
Post by bencat on May 14, 2024 9:46:40 GMT
So in fact you are going for a Raspberry Pi4 based system anyway . Good luck but if you feel you want to build one yourself the offer of the Pi4 board is still there .
|
|
|
Post by bencat on May 14, 2024 10:09:05 GMT
Oli just spotted a Pi2aes DIY streamer on eBay . Not perhaps what you are looking for but may well be a stop gap while you find one . It would also give you scope for improving the power supply and adding a good case of you wanted to .
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,400
Member is Online
|
Post by Bigman80 on May 14, 2024 11:54:47 GMT
So in fact you are going for a Raspberry Pi4 based system anyway . Good luck but if you feel you want to build one yourself the offer of the Pi4 board is still there . My intentions were to hunt down a Mercury V2 streamer, which doesn't have a RPI4 compute module. The V3 has a RPI4...unless I have misunderstood the coms between PI2AES and myself.
|
|
|
Post by bencat on May 14, 2024 12:31:36 GMT
Oli the V2 is based on the Compute Module 4 which is a cut down Raspberry Pi so the bones are the same just the peripherals are different . As someone who has used Pi based players and Pi servers I do not hold the view that they are poor sounding versions of streamers in fact with good power supplies and decent hats such as the Pi2aes at the time and Allo Digihat Signature later they offer very high quality playback . Often people just see the very simple cases and presume they can not possibly sound any good but they do . Many companies have used the Pi as the basis for their own streamers but often want to keep it quiet because of the suggestion there is something cheap about them
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,400
Member is Online
|
Post by Bigman80 on May 14, 2024 20:47:37 GMT
Oli the V2 is based on the Compute Module 4 which is a cut down Raspberry Pi so the bones are the same just the peripherals are different . As someone who has used Pi based players and Pi servers I do not hold the view that they are poor sounding versions of streamers in fact with good power supplies and decent hats such as the Pi2aes at the time and Allo Digihat Signature later they offer very high quality playback . Often people just see the very simple cases and presume they can not possibly sound any good but they do . Many companies have used the Pi as the basis for their own streamers but often want to keep it quiet because of the suggestion there is something cheap about them Well, I think I was possibly the first adopter of the Orchard Audio streaming DAC, which was Rpi based, and truly superb. I do not hold the view that RPi cannot be part of a superb performing device, but I do support the view that playing files back via an external USB device is significantly worse than playing files that are stored internally. This was proved with my moves to streamers with internal storage, such as the Digibit Aria and Novafidelity devices. My decision to pass on your kind offer is due to this. I want a device that has internal storage, and not just a USB connected device to a USB port. The Mercury V2/V3 streamers do this, which is why they are on my radar.
|
|
|
Post by bencat on May 15, 2024 8:48:43 GMT
Had a think about your comments and in truth I have never used a usb cable for signal to DAC , mainly because i do not have a usb DAC but also because I have never been convinced about usb being used as a digital audio transfer medium , but I think that is a very different can of worms .
Now using a Pi as a music server with an SSD HD attached via USB has been something I have done and in my view it has worked well . Up to Pi4 the USB on any Pi was not that good and shared its pwoer with other chips on the design which was not great and caused noise . From Pi 4 they got better solo implementation of USB and it was much better . In the years before that change there were two tweaks that I was shown that could really make things work much better , but more important sound much better as well . First was to increase the power output on the Pi to full for the USB . Some HD units demanded quite a lot of power and performance was reduced unless they were fed this .
Second and really the most important and which I still used with the Pi4 despite its improvements is that within the settings of LMS you can vary how the server deals with incoming streams . One option is that you can use an oversize SD card (32G but I use 64 or 128) and then you set the server to cache any stream on to the SD card which then holds it and sends the stream to the player from there . This in effect means when you are playing any music it is not coming direct from the SSD HD but direct from the internal SD card . There is some where a tool that allows you to vary the cache size which can be another rabbit hole that you can go down to get the best compromises of size and sound quality . Also on Moode audio they offer this option on a player so you can have the same treatment done at the end point rather than at the server . I have tried this but I am not going to be able to say honestly that I could notice a difference were it was done . I will however say for sure that cacheing the music on one of the SD cards did make a very definite improvement .
I currently use a LIV Zen as my LMS server and this is a small form PC with a SATA HD in place . THis was made by Innuos before they changed their name and is based on an old set up called Vortex Box . It is very old but still works without any issues and you are also able to switch it to cache the stream before sending , though in this case it is going to RAM rather than an SD card . I do not think it sounds any better than my Pi LMS and the main reason to switch was that I could put a new 8 TB SATA HD in in to give me loads of room to add more music 2 TB options had run out of space on the Pi and 4 TB SSD drives are a bit expensive .
|
|
|
Post by antonio on May 15, 2024 9:13:34 GMT
Just wait until an Eversolo A6 comes up for a price you feel happy paying.
|
|
optical
Moderator
BIG STAR
Be Excellent To Eachother
Posts: 1,624
|
Post by optical on May 15, 2024 9:22:09 GMT
Just wait until an Eversolo A6 comes up for a price you feel happy paying. Not a bad shout at all Dave. I initially overlooked these due to the omission of AES output (which I still think it should have), however I am now pretty happy using both coax and (even more so!) USB, so it's a more attractive package for sure.
|
|
|
Post by antonio on May 15, 2024 9:30:54 GMT
optical I did briefly try it with usb after always using coaxial. We both thought usb was best, the difference to us was subtle, but to the golden eared few it'll be night and day.
|
|
|
Post by gninnam on May 15, 2024 20:47:26 GMT
Oli the V2 is based on the Compute Module 4 which is a cut down Raspberry Pi so the bones are the same just the peripherals are different . As someone who has used Pi based players and Pi servers I do not hold the view that they are poor sounding versions of streamers in fact with good power supplies and decent hats such as the Pi2aes at the time and Allo Digihat Signature later they offer very high quality playback . Often people just see the very simple cases and presume they can not possibly sound any good but they do . Many companies have used the Pi as the basis for their own streamers but often want to keep it quiet because of the suggestion there is something cheap about them Well, I think I was possibly the first adopter of the Orchard Audio streaming DAC, which was Rpi based, and truly superb. I do not hold the view that RPi cannot be part of a superb performing device, but I do support the view that playing files back via an external USB device is significantly worse than playing files that are stored internally. This was proved with my moves to streamers with internal storage, such as the Digibit Aria and Novafidelity devices. My decision to pass on your kind offer is due to this. I want a device that has internal storage, and not just a USB connected device to a USB port. The Mercury V2/V3 streamers do this, which is why they are on my radar. You can get NVMe storage (just like an SSD drive) that does not use the USB port but a connection directly to the board giving you the internal storage you require using a hat etc.
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,400
Member is Online
|
Post by Bigman80 on May 15, 2024 23:11:57 GMT
Well it seems the V3 doesn't have internal storage...
From Michael Kelly ofPi2AES :
"Mercury V3 does not offer internal storage. But adding an external USB3 drive is easy and fast. Volumio will recognize it and allow you to play files from it. Something like the Buffalo USB3 is a great choice and will run without external power."
Looks like a V2 or nothing then.
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,400
Member is Online
|
Post by Bigman80 on May 16, 2024 12:15:27 GMT
A busy few days of comparison lie ahead with the Soekris 2541, Topping D70S and the modded Aqvox. Thanks to the loaners of these DACs, I will be able to put some niggling doubt to bed with a lengthy audition in my new system. My Steely Dan box set landed today, so that's going to be playing a large part in this too.
|
|