|
Post by antonio on Feb 12, 2021 22:56:54 GMT
An informative write up Jimbo, I do like the look of those speakers.
|
|
|
Post by gninnam on Feb 12, 2021 23:24:11 GMT
So glad this is working out for you Jim - wish I could be there to hear what you are hearing! Put me on the list to have a go with Oli's system What is the full price for the Neurochrome 686 with all the bells and whistles??
|
|
|
Post by robbiegong on Feb 12, 2021 23:54:21 GMT
So glad this is working out for you Jim - wish I could be there to hear what you are hearing! Put me on the list to have a go with Oli's system What is the full price for the Neurochrome 686 with all the bells and whistles?? Yep! and whats da full spec Olster ? Might be an idea you lay out price options, wpc, construction ie: dual mono / etc etc. I sense a phono stage will be required.....
|
|
|
Post by gninnam on Feb 13, 2021 0:03:45 GMT
So glad this is working out for you Jim - wish I could be there to hear what you are hearing! Put me on the list to have a go with Oli's system What is the full price for the Neurochrome 686 with all the bells and whistles?? Yep! and whats da full spec Olster ? Might be an idea you lay out price options, wpc, construction ie: dual mono / etc etc. I sense a phono stage will be required..... What he said
|
|
bigbird
Regular
The Racing Snake
Posts: 200
|
Post by bigbird on Feb 13, 2021 4:46:37 GMT
Haha I told ya Jim. Absolutely no compatibility problems whatsoever with the 25R mate . That will give you an indication of how the monoblocks sound with it he 25R .
The monos do 95% of what the 686 does but it’s that little extra level of clarity and transparency that comes through with the neuro that takes it into the reference leagues . There really is a cats whisker in it over here in my system , but as I mentioned , the 25r is strangling the performance of both amps so I need to get the BT2 installed to see just how much and reveal the true capabilities of both amps.
I suspect the next part of this review with the BT2 installed may have you re-examining wether to stay with the Croft setup or not ??
When you can get all of the good traits of a valve amp , without some of its drawbacks , which the 686 does at a very good price point , then the whole valve vs solid state goes out the window. It just sounds so well balanced as you mentioned and with sublime clarity.
Will be interesting to see which direction you go mate .
|
|
bigbird
Regular
The Racing Snake
Posts: 200
|
Post by bigbird on Feb 13, 2021 5:29:15 GMT
So glad this is working out for you Jim - wish I could be there to hear what you are hearing! Put me on the list to have a go with Oli's system What is the full price for the Neurochrome 686 with all the bells and whistles?? Yep! and whats da full spec Olster ? Might be an idea you lay out price options, wpc, construction ie: dual mono / etc etc. I sense a phono stage will be required..... Hi Rob hope you are well. Thought this might be useful to some of you lads seeing as I’ve built one recently. With regards to a bells and whistles 686 I’ve put together a little rundown of what my one cost to give you guys an indication of what it takes to make a TOP spec 686. Obviously if you build the boards yourself , lose the speaker protection, and use an SMPS then Tom says one can be built for around $1900 (1400 quid) which incrementally goes up as you add fully built boards, protection or toroidal PSU back in. I wanted a no compromise build and went the whole hog . Here’s a list of what you would need for that Full set of amp, Psu , soft start , and guardian boards , with wiring loom came to $1928 (US) which is roughly £1400 Next was the chassis , Modushop deluxe 4U with logos on the front and all holes predrilled as per Tom’s CAD drawing . It’s Effing huge and built like a tank . Total including shipping to Australia which added around 100 euros was just under 500 euros so likely €450 for within Europe . So let’s say around £400 ish . Next was the Toroidy ‘supreme audio grade’ transformer . This was probably overkill in a power amp as a standard audio grade would do the job nicely for €120. But as with the no compromise approach ,only the best was going in this amp. I had it made with 4x25v 800VA windings to make it a dual mono (or at least as good as true dual mono) this was €190 so around £150 ? The extra 60 odd euro gets you a nice shiny case , potted and shielded in epoxy . I bought a few metres of the top Neotech 7N UPOCC wiring for all of the signal wires as this is generally considered to be the best of the easily available stuff . I think that was about 40 quid from America ? Viborgs top of the line BP604G pure copper binding posts with carbon fibre housing were €99 for a set of four Viborgs RC102G gold plated pure copper RCA posts with Teflon insulation were €55 a pair . I then asked Tom to supply me with a full hardware package of nuts ,bolts , standoffs, thermal paste , hookup wire etc to save me trawling mouser etc for parts . He charged me $26 for this which was fantastic . So all in all the total build was around £2160 using rough exchange rates . To get an amp this good for this kind of money is crazy . There definitely a small improvement over my Croft 7R monoblocks . Plus it’s a piece of cake to put together too. Lego for Hifi nerds . Tom’s instructions are foolproof. If you can use a screwdriver and alan key your are all set . As you can see from the picture below it’s just a case of screwing the boards to the chassis and connecting point A to B with the wiring as per the instructions .
|
|
|
Post by jimbo on Feb 13, 2021 5:59:48 GMT
So glad this is working out for you Jim - wish I could be there to hear what you are hearing! Put me on the list to have a go with Oli's system What is the full price for the Neurochrome 686 with all the bells and whistles?? Haha funny you should ask Andy, I have been doing some theoretical Bill of materials for the 686 and It can be built for £1500 -£2200 depending on specs used for Case, Toroids, input sockets. I think Karl has built a top spec version of the 686 so his will be probably as high as you would go. I am sure he may share the price with us?
|
|
|
Post by jimbo on Feb 13, 2021 6:05:55 GMT
Haha I told ya Jim. Absolutely no compatibility problems whatsoever with the 25R mate . That will give you an indication of how the monoblocks sound with it he 25R . The monos do 95% of what the 686 does but it’s that little extra level of clarity and transparency that comes through with the neuro that takes it into the reference leagues . There really is a cats whisker in it over here in my system , but as I mentioned , the 25r is strangling the performance of both amps so I need to get the BT2 installed to see just how much and reveal the true capabilities of both amps. I suspect the next part of this review with the BT2 installed may have you re-examining wether to stay with the Croft setup or not ?? When you can get all of the good traits of a valve amp , without some of its drawbacks , which the 686 does at a very good price point , then the whole valve vs solid state goes out the window. It just sounds so well balanced as you mentioned and with sublime clarity. Will be interesting to see which direction you go mate . Next part of the reviews coming up as fast as I can type here Karl and there maybe some surprises which you have certainly touched on. As you are probably correct in saying the 7R monos probably do 95% of the Neuro and the BT2 does add something into the mix but there is a caveat.
I do not have the 7Rs unfortunately but I do have a 7 which gives me a fair indication to compare and of course I have a 25R and my final conclusion maybe worth you reading!
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,408
|
Post by Bigman80 on Feb 13, 2021 6:53:28 GMT
So glad this is working out for you Jim - wish I could be there to hear what you are hearing! Put me on the list to have a go with Oli's system What is the full price for the Neurochrome 686 with all the bells and whistles?? You are welcome to loan anything in the system. Just leave me with that Burson amp 🤣
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,408
|
Post by Bigman80 on Feb 13, 2021 6:59:26 GMT
So glad this is working out for you Jim - wish I could be there to hear what you are hearing! Put me on the list to have a go with Oli's system What is the full price for the Neurochrome 686 with all the bells and whistles?? Yep! and whats da full spec Olster ? Might be an idea you lay out price options, wpc, construction ie: dual mono / etc etc. I sense a phono stage will be required..... My 686 doesn't have all the Neurochrome gubbins...only the 686 amplifier PCBs The PSU, the wiring looms and pretty much everything else inside is hand made P2P stuff by Angus. I'm not 100% sure what he did in there but I can tell you that the PSU doesn't work in the same way as the Neurochrome designed PSU. Whether one is better than the other, I couldn't tell you.
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,408
|
Post by Bigman80 on Feb 13, 2021 7:00:55 GMT
Yep! and whats da full spec Olster ? Might be an idea you lay out price options, wpc, construction ie: dual mono / etc etc. I sense a phono stage will be required..... Hi Rob hope you are well. Thought this might be useful to some of you lads seeing as I’ve built one recently. With regards to a bells and whistles 686 I’ve put together a little rundown of what my one cost to give you guys an indication of what it takes to make a TOP spec 686. Obviously if you build the boards yourself , lose the speaker protection, and use an SMPS then Tom says one can be built for around $1900 (1400 quid) which incrementally goes up as you add fully built boards, protection or toroidal PSU back in. I wanted a no compromise build and went the whole hog . Here’s a list of what you would need for that Full set of amp, Psu , soft start , and guardian boards , with wiring loom came to $1928 (US) which is roughly £1400 Next was the chassis , Modushop deluxe 4U with logos on the front and all holes predrilled as per Tom’s CAD drawing . It’s Effing huge and built like a tank . Total including shipping to Australia which added around 100 euros was just under 500 euros so likely €450 for within Europe . So let’s say around £400 ish . Next was the Toroidy ‘supreme audio grade’ transformer . This was probably overkill in a power amp as a standard audio grade would do the job nicely for €120. But as with the no compromise approach ,only the best was going in this amp. I had it made with 4x25v 800VA windings to make it a dual mono (or at least as good as true dual mono) this was €190 so around £150 ? The extra 60 odd euro gets you a nice shiny case , potted and shielded in epoxy . I bought a few metres of the top Neotech 7N UPOCC wiring for all of the signal wires as this is generally considered to be the best of the easily available stuff . I think that was about 40 quid from America ? Viborgs top of the line BP604G pure copper binding posts with carbon fibre housing were €99 for a set of four Viborgs RC102G gold plated pure copper RCA posts with Teflon insulation were €55 a pair . I then asked Tom to supply me with a full hardware package of nuts ,bolts , standoffs, thermal paste , hookup wire etc to save me trawling mouser etc for parts . He charged me $26 for this which was fantastic . So all in all the total build was around £2160 using rough exchange rates . To get an amp this good for this kind of money is crazy . There definitely a small improvement over my Croft 7R monoblocks . Plus it’s a piece of cake to put together too. Lego for Hifi nerds . Tom’s instructions are foolproof. If you can use a screwdriver and alan key your are all set . As you can see from the picture below it’s just a case of screwing the boards to the chassis and connecting point A to B with the wiring as per the instructions . Nice build is that.
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,408
|
Post by Bigman80 on Feb 13, 2021 7:14:45 GMT
jimbo Ha! I wondered how you were getting on with the change In Presentation. It can be quite hard on the brain when everything you listen to is altered, especially when you have spent so long listening to it in a certain way. Your system has been very settled for a long time, minus the speakers obvs, so a change like this will have a big impact. Really enjoying reading the run down of your experiments though. Keep going!
|
|
bigbird
Regular
The Racing Snake
Posts: 200
|
Post by bigbird on Feb 13, 2021 8:22:07 GMT
Hi Rob hope you are well. Thought this might be useful to some of you lads seeing as I’ve built one recently. With regards to a bells and whistles 686 I’ve put together a little rundown of what my one cost to give you guys an indication of what it takes to make a TOP spec 686. Obviously if you build the boards yourself , lose the speaker protection, and use an SMPS then Tom says one can be built for around $1900 (1400 quid) which incrementally goes up as you add fully built boards, protection or toroidal PSU back in. I wanted a no compromise build and went the whole hog . Here’s a list of what you would need for that Full set of amp, Psu , soft start , and guardian boards , with wiring loom came to $1928 (US) which is roughly £1400 Next was the chassis , Modushop deluxe 4U with logos on the front and all holes predrilled as per Tom’s CAD drawing . It’s Effing huge and built like a tank . Total including shipping to Australia which added around 100 euros was just under 500 euros so likely €450 for within Europe . So let’s say around £400 ish . Next was the Toroidy ‘supreme audio grade’ transformer . This was probably overkill in a power amp as a standard audio grade would do the job nicely for €120. But as with the no compromise approach ,only the best was going in this amp. I had it made with 4x25v 800VA windings to make it a dual mono (or at least as good as true dual mono) this was €190 so around £150 ? The extra 60 odd euro gets you a nice shiny case , potted and shielded in epoxy . I bought a few metres of the top Neotech 7N UPOCC wiring for all of the signal wires as this is generally considered to be the best of the easily available stuff . I think that was about 40 quid from America ? Viborgs top of the line BP604G pure copper binding posts with carbon fibre housing were €99 for a set of four Viborgs RC102G gold plated pure copper RCA posts with Teflon insulation were €55 a pair . I then asked Tom to supply me with a full hardware package of nuts ,bolts , standoffs, thermal paste , hookup wire etc to save me trawling mouser etc for parts . He charged me $26 for this which was fantastic . So all in all the total build was around £2160 using rough exchange rates . To get an amp this good for this kind of money is crazy . There definitely a small improvement over my Croft 7R monoblocks . Plus it’s a piece of cake to put together too. Lego for Hifi nerds . Tom’s instructions are foolproof. If you can use a screwdriver and alan key your are all set . As you can see from the picture below it’s just a case of screwing the boards to the chassis and connecting point A to B with the wiring as per the instructions . Nice build is that. Thanks mate . Sounds as good as it looks too
|
|
bigbird
Regular
The Racing Snake
Posts: 200
|
Post by bigbird on Feb 13, 2021 8:25:52 GMT
VPI 1.1 - 25R - BT2 - 686
As I had most of Olivers system here I had yet to hear the BT2 which is his new preamp. I had heard a prototype and I had heard it in Oli's system but not my own. During my listening session with vinyl Oli suggested I insert the BT2 between my Preamp which has a line out and into the 686. This would cut out the preamp section of the Croft and allow me just to hear the phono stage. I have not posted a close picture of the BT2 as it may not be the finished article but it is in at least one of my pics at a distance.
So with the BT2 in situ the sound became a little drier and tight with a slight brittle presentation to the sound. My system sounded less analogue and even more like digital! The BT2 is like the 686 very neutral and very clean sounding with great transparency and probably more accurate than my preamp. The soundstage was very slightly smaller and I felt it robbed the music of a touch of life, not in a dynamic or contrasting way but it made it sound more sterile or hermetically sealed. If you like accuracy and possibly a more closer to the truth sound the BT2 is definitely a preamp that falls into this category but for me it was a retrograde step in my system and I did not feel it worked for me with vinyl.
I would say it compliments the 686 very well in that it performs in the same universe.
I the tried this set up with digital with much better results.
Soekris - BT2 - 686
Plugging the Soekriss into the BT2 - 686 gave me Olivers system through my Heco speakers. So my journey had ended up listening finally to Olivers complete digital set up and now things were different. The BT2 changed character somewhat and gelled very well with the 686, not only were they from the same universe they were on the same planet and throwing digital into the mix gave me a superb digital set up in this combination. There was now just the right amount of weight and great transparency with a very neutral take on the music. The sound was powerful and vivid but not in your face. The BT2 compliments the 686 perfectly and I take my hat off to Oli getting this superb match and integration.
I listened to about an hour with this sytem and my final thoughts were that it was a touch analytical and that it confirmed what I thought of digital. If you want a digital system or play digital music predominently this would be a killer system. I have not heard better. Nothing is missing and nothing taken away. There is lots to revel in and enjoy. It can make you marvel at some digital recordings which sound magnificent through this sytem. It does not make the error of plunging down the total detail at the expense of the music route. There is a very nice balance to the BT2 and 686 in this respect and enough weight and warmth and asee through presentation to the recording. This is the best digital set up i have heard in this respect.
Getting back to the 686 which was the main purpose of my listening session I came away with my head spinning after 12 hours with so many combinations but the 686 was like a rock at the centre casting complete control and order on everything and telling you all you needed to know about every combination. I will listen more today and try and write up a conclusion some parts of which fall into place easily because they are objective observations but my subjective observations will be more difficult to wrestle with as ultimately I will have to decide if the 686 is an amplifier that would suit my system!
Fantastic write up Jim. A really enjoyable read and some of you fellas have a great way of articulating what you hear . I think this has made me glad I didn’t just flog my monos as soon as the 686 was finished , which I wanted to do in order to buy a Pontus. I’m really intrigued now to hear which combination is going to work best over here . Will it be monos with BT2, will it be 686 with 25R , will it be the solid state combo or Croft combo ?? Only time will tell.
|
|
|
Post by electronumpty on Feb 13, 2021 9:34:38 GMT
Great write ups👍👍
Having a Neurochrome headphone amp I can fully appreciate what you say about the transparency of the kit. Sound like the same but obviously you have it in spades with the 686. Must see if I can use the HP2 as a pre into my monos and see how that sounds. There is a way I have read about.
|
|
|
Post by brian2957 on Feb 13, 2021 9:54:07 GMT
This is great writing James and almost brings the reader into your room. Makes me wish even more that I was there. Your posts are well written and very informative . I'm sure anyone who is remotely in the same position as you will find this most informative. Have a great weekend listening to all this wonderful gear. Thanks for taking the time to post about your adventures with all this this gear James
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2021 10:55:40 GMT
Yes Oli, I am so glad I dived in and bought the Hecos. I know most people have never heard off them never mind actually heard a pair but as you know when you do get to sit in front of a pair especially with a stellar set up they are stunning. I have not managed to get them to put a step out of place today whatever I have hooked up to them. True bargain of the hifi world. The 686 + Hecos are definitely a marriage made in heaven, I am surprised Angus has not built himself a 686 to drive them! They definitely like more power but dont go bonkers when you turn the wick up, very composed. The 686 brings more dynamic drive to them as well as that see through transparency to the recording whether digital or analogue. Analogue sounds amazingly clean? Angus is building something A little more......................Japanese. However, it's design ideas are very much in line with the Neurochromes circuit. Its just using older technology but with very similar performance specs. Knowing Angus it will be something stunning to listen to. I'm actually kind of pleased he has gone in a different direction as we're all ending up with very similar systems here. That's no bad thing as the quality is sensational, but what are we gonna talk about if everyone has the same kit. 🤣 The music? That is what this is all about, isn’t it?
|
|
|
Post by macca on Feb 13, 2021 11:08:15 GMT
All very interesting and as usual great write-ups from Jim. I've thought for a long time the amplification is by the far the most important part of a (digitally fronted) system. usually only amplifier designers agree with me lol.
Now I'm in the market for new power amp all a bit more relevant to me.
I like the system to impart as little of its own character on the music as possible, not everyone wants that, I think this is the dilemma now faced.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2021 11:12:05 GMT
I think it would be interesting for you to try a BB3 with the BT2 amd 686 Jimbo. You may find that the Croft phono is a limiting factor in the system...
|
|
|
Post by jimbo on Feb 13, 2021 11:15:19 GMT
I think it would be interesting for you to try a BB3 with the BT2 amd 686 Jimbo. You may find that the Croft phono is a limiting factor in the system... Depends on what you mean by limiting and dont forget we are not all looking for the same sound !
|
|
|
Post by jimbo on Feb 13, 2021 11:18:26 GMT
All very interesting and as usual great write-ups from Jim. I've thought for a long time the amplification is by the far the most important part of a (digitally fronted) system. usually only amplifier designers agree with me lol. Now I'm in the market for new power amp all a bit more relevant to me. I like the system to impart as little of its own character on the music as possible, not everyone wants that, I think this is the dilemma now faced. I think the 686 would be your dream amp Martin. It has almost no character of its own and is as neutral an amp I have ever heard. Every other amp I have listened too imparts some character like speakers do but the 686 does not. It is as transparent as air, yes the window is not even there!
|
|
|
JimBlog
Feb 13, 2021 11:21:17 GMT
via mobile
Post by stevew on Feb 13, 2021 11:21:17 GMT
Yeah, brilliantly well written as ever Jim. New retirement career... hifi equipment reviewer! An awful lot of variables to take on board. Can’t wait till the current restrictions end ... what a brilliant bake off this lot could have been part of. It also raises the issue of what an individual actually wants out of a system. Since plumbing in the Denafrips Ares into my main system I actually get excited to play more music in that system. In the basement the system there delivers more bass, more detail (more vivid? But probably not in same league as this kit).. but I don’t get drawn into the music as I do upstairs.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2021 11:31:49 GMT
I think it would be interesting for you to try a BB3 with the BT2 amd 686 Jimbo. You may find that the Croft phono is a limiting factor in the system... Depends on what you mean by limiting and dont forget we are not all looking for the same sound ! Hence the use of “you may find” as I do not know if it is a limiting factor.
|
|
|
Post by jimbo on Feb 13, 2021 11:39:38 GMT
Yeah, brilliantly well written as ever Jim. New retirement career... hifi equipment reviewer! An awful lot of variables to take on board. Can’t wait till the current restrictions end ... what a brilliant bake off this lot could have been part of. It also raises the issue of what an individual actually wants out of a system. Since plumbing in the Denafrips Ares into my main system I actually get excited to play more music in that system. In the basement the system there delivers more bass, more detail (more vivid? But probably not in same league as this kit).. but I don’t get drawn into the music as I do upstairs. Thanks Steve, when you have the kit i have been kindly loaned it gives you a huge enthusiasm to write about it and try and convey to others how I hear it. Oli is a very generous chap letting me borow equipment as other many other folk on here. Takes me back to the early days when HIFI shops were much more friendly people places and they would let youloan gear because they knew you personally.
A bake off would have been great so I have tried to write this up as one but obviously its a bit one sided!
Yes listening has allowed me to some conclusions I think but they will not be easy. I will try and write them up tomorow.
Great when you get kit like the Denafrips Ares DAC that enthuses you to listen, good equipment always does that for sure.
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,408
|
Post by Bigman80 on Feb 13, 2021 11:41:26 GMT
All very interesting and as usual great write-ups from Jim. I've thought for a long time the amplification is by the far the most important part of a (digitally fronted) system. usually only amplifier designers agree with me lol. Now I'm in the market for new power amp all a bit more relevant to me. I like the system to impart as little of its own character on the music as possible, not everyone wants that, I think this is the dilemma now faced. A 686 is perfect for you Macca. It's not off the shelf I know, but we have a very experienced 686 builder in firebottle who I'm sure would help you out. The Benchmark is Interesting but I'm not sure what the PS is. If it's SMPS I'd run a mile.
|
|
|
Post by robbiegong on Feb 13, 2021 11:51:49 GMT
Many thanks for taking the time to layout the cost of build Bigbird, much appreciated and loving the insightful write ups James. What always stands out as very apparent, whenever I've read about Neurochrome / the 686 is the low low almost non existent noise floor. A big sign of properly chosen, quality electronics which clearly (no pun intended) allows the music / recording to come through, unhindered, with clarity and transparency, not mush/hash and therefore music in all its glory. That's when / why Jimbo is experiencing, as he's expressed - 'It produces such low distortion in the recording and has such a black background you forget your listening to vinyl!'and the obvious vividness that is so apparent to both he and Helen. This in particular is the massive appeal for me personally, as it represents true Hi-fidelity, the key aspect of an end game piece, a component that gets out of the way, does not impart its character or own take on things. After all, it's about the recorded music and the accurate extraction / revelation of it, laid bare... Now, and for the one box, integrated amplification lovers like myself - If these guys were ever to produce an integrated version of something like the 686, dual mono with excellent on-board phono stage for both mm and mc man ! I'd contemplate selling all my other worldly possessions for one of them The Neurochrome Reference 686 Integrated - There you go, let's 'av it !
|
|
|
Post by macca on Feb 13, 2021 11:59:29 GMT
All very interesting and as usual great write-ups from Jim. I've thought for a long time the amplification is by the far the most important part of a (digitally fronted) system. usually only amplifier designers agree with me lol. Now I'm in the market for new power amp all a bit more relevant to me. I like the system to impart as little of its own character on the music as possible, not everyone wants that, I think this is the dilemma now faced. A 686 is perfect for you Macca. It's not off the shelf I know, but we have a very experienced 686 builder in firebottle who I'm sure would help you out. The Benchmark is Interesting but I'm not sure what the PS is. If it's SMPS I'd run a mile. Yes it does use a switched mode PS, that's how it can be so small.
|
|
|
Post by gninnam on Feb 13, 2021 12:10:07 GMT
So glad this is working out for you Jim - wish I could be there to hear what you are hearing! Put me on the list to have a go with Oli's system What is the full price for the Neurochrome 686 with all the bells and whistles?? You are welcome to loan anything in the system. Just leave me with that Burson amp 🤣 Deal - in fact you can keep the Burson amp if you keep lending your Neurochrome out as it is currently just sat under the hifi rack (until I want it back....)! As to Jim's erudite commentary on how the Neuro amp works with his system is very refreshing and makes me wonder if it is the next route I should take? Been running the Puresound A30 (as a power amp) for many years now and still love the presentation it gives (I did swap the Burson in for a few weeks and as much as it is a very good power amp I missed the lushness in the sound that the A30 gave me) so wondering how the Neuro would hold out to my ears. Thing is, everyone is saying that the amp doesn't impart anything in what you hear, but I can't see that as electronics impart something into the mix so to me what you are hearing it is just something different (and how do you know what the original recording sounds like unless you were sat behind the mixing desk ) - just a thought!
|
|
|
Post by misterc on Feb 13, 2021 12:12:14 GMT
The 686 and BM are very different animals the BM has a lower noise floor and insight, though the 686 has a more enveloping sound it a touch dry for me but not as dry as the BM. Both have their merits without question.
I can see why Jim likes the croft with the 686, the Buffer will open things out and improve the bass I suspect again its a different fit in different system, but the goodness shines through.
A nicely built 686 is a good amp and will work well in many systems, even with though with more resolution.
Both amps are polar opposites from the Krell, as with all these things a week long home demo is essential imho
If you are confident in your abilities (Or get Alan to put it together for you if you go that route) or if you purchase something new then a warranty is given. Horses for courses.
Jim nicely constructed write up and well thought out sir, can we ask you to produce a follow up say in 7 to 10 days as the 686 beds in.
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,408
|
Post by Bigman80 on Feb 13, 2021 12:17:03 GMT
I think it would be interesting for you to try a BB3 with the BT2 and 686 Jimbo. You may find that the Croft phono is a limiting factor in the system... I absolutely agree with you, but Jims love for the Croft 25R pre may be even stronger than my love for Lemon Merengue! Jims motive for this experiment was to see if the 686 would work with his Croft pre and deliver the dose of umph he felt his system needed from more power. The experiment was a fact finding mission, rather than a croft 7 Vs Neurochrome 686 battle. The Way Jim is currently shoe-horning the BT2 and the croft preamp is far from ideal and i discovered yesterday that simply using the "line out" of the crofts preamp, may not be working as i had thought. In fact, it's not working lol. There was a Stereophile review that did the same apparently, and they had all sorts of issue. To get a Croft phonostage to sound "brittle" is no mean feat and it certainly isn't what i have come to experience from the Croft or the BT2. A BB3 would have been perfect to use but as i haven't got one available, we couldn't do that. I can only surmise that a chronic mismatch has occurred. Thats why i suggested using the Soekris for evaluation purposes for both the Croft pre and BT2 into the 686 and croft 7 amps. This was very much a side project, but I believed this would clearly demonstrate the BT2's ability and superiority, and from what Jim said, it did. Jim is a vinyl guy and i knew the Digital wouldn't be where he spent his time evaluating everything, and why would you when you use mainly vinyl! Obviously the Vinyl attempt hasn't worked but we can revisit that at a later date. No issues. I think it's important to remember that Jim is trying to add to his system, rather than totally replace it. He loves the Croft sound and it totally understandable why. I love Jims system as is.
|
|