|
Post by bencat on Dec 21, 2023 11:18:57 GMT
Okay I was at my friend Grahams yesterday as he had spoken me new to him Wilson Bensch Arc speakers .First thing that stood out was how small they were . Then there was how they were set up really deep like right foot in to the room about a metre and half away from the listening position and about three meters apart . So I was expecting it to be like headphone sound very close with limited depth . But no the sound did not seem to come from the speakers but within a very large sound stage created in the space behind the speakers . Sound quality was really good but the impression of space and a recording in another place was tangible . Never hear this before and with the speakers so close expected the opposite with sound pushed forward . Not able to try this in my room with the Quads as the cables not long enough but might look to borrow some stands and small speakers to give it a try .
|
|
Arke
Moderator
Posts: 1,259
Member is Online
|
Post by Arke on Dec 21, 2023 11:57:55 GMT
Sounds like a really good setup and listening experience. So hard to comment without actually hearing what you heard. Maybe Optical can shed more light as he has a relatively nearfield setup.
Small (and well implemented) speakers can often do the trick of disappearing into the listening environment. Sounds like your friend has set them up really well.
|
|
optical
Moderator
BIG STAR
Be Excellent To Eachother
Posts: 1,623
|
Post by optical on Dec 21, 2023 14:27:10 GMT
Indeed I probably would consider mine a relatively near field setup although it's still not quite at those dimensions mentioned there.
If it sounds good, it sounds good but that does strike me as either the speakers being a tad far apart or the listening position a little too close.
A small deviation from the standard equilateral triangle configuration, can yield good results but I suppose it could work at other extremes.
As ever a huge variation on speakers and rooms so it's good to experiment anyway.
|
|
|
Post by jandl100 on Dec 21, 2023 18:32:34 GMT
I pulled my speakers further into the room after seeing bencat's musings. And yes, it worked for me producing a deeper soundstage and better focused imaging. Not quite so convenient in room, and I'm sure I shall curse a bit every time I stub my toe on the speaker platform nearest the door!
|
|
optical
Moderator
BIG STAR
Be Excellent To Eachother
Posts: 1,623
|
Post by optical on Dec 21, 2023 18:39:23 GMT
I pulled my speakers further into the room after seeing bencat's musings. And yes, it worked for me producing a deeper soundstage and better focused imaging. Not quite so convenient in room, and I'm sure I shall curse a bit every time I stub my toe on the speaker platform nearest the door! Small price to pay for superior SQ!! 😉 There is a point of diminishing returns but generally, if they're good speakers, they will open more up the further into the room they are. There are limits though, obviously you don't want them half way into the room and some speakers require some room reinforcement so do get a bit lost when moved further in. Good work though chaps 👍
|
|
|
Post by bencat on Dec 22, 2023 9:42:44 GMT
Chris while I have in the past thought what exactly what you did , and you are spot on with boundary enhanced designs this set up is far from this with the speakers at least half way in to the room . I am going to borrow a pair of stand mounts and stands and try and see if this works in my room as well . There is little doubt that this type of placement is not domestic friendly and takes up far too much space plus with children about it would be very dangerous . But I want to hear if it works in a very different room and system . Once I have had a try will let everyone know what I think .
|
|
|
Post by jandl100 on Dec 22, 2023 10:11:10 GMT
I pulled my speakers further into the room after seeing bencat's musings. And yes, it worked for me producing a deeper soundstage and better focused imaging. Not quite so convenient in room, and I'm sure I shall curse a bit every time I stub my toe on the speaker platform nearest the door! Hmm. Whoops. The overall tonal balance has shifted up the frequency range. I might want more bass weight than this. Luckily I have a digital equaliser in circuit, I'll have a play with that along with some pink noise.
|
|
|
Post by bencat on Dec 22, 2023 10:28:16 GMT
Jerry nice that you are always prepared to give things a try . I have to admit I am going to try it but even if it sounds superb it is not a placement that I could live with . Domestic pressure from my wife and visiting grandchildren would see to that .
|
|
|
Post by bencat on Dec 26, 2023 13:13:46 GMT
Well as my wife Linda was working Christmas eve and through to 15.00 on Christmas day I had the time to play about and experiment with the Quads . Speaker cables were fine but the mains leads were not . Used an extension lead and was able to bring them right out in to the middle of the room and about metre and a half from the listening position . So similar to how Graham has his Arcs . Started with them facing straight ahead and not the result I was expecting . Image and music was all still in front with f the speakers not filling the larger space behind them as it was in Grahams . Employed a large amount of toe in and things improved a little but not really anything like the original sound I heard . So the room and the speakers matter and Quads just do not work as well this way . But nothing lost as the large toe in did work better so when I moved them back closer to the back wall about 13 inches away I changed the toe in by degrees and achieved a point were things worked better than firing straight ahead and much better than our in the middle of the room . It does seem strange to me that closer to the wall creates a better sound image in both side to side but more pronounced in depth . Performances now come from a real acoustic place as has been placed on the album and it does not matternifbitbus a real venue or just a studio created set up . You can tell the difference but they are both there for you to hear . But of course this is not the end for this . Is this effect just from moving coil speakers ? Well that has to be next Graham has promised to bring round some stand mounts with stands and we will see if that can work , it will at least point to the conclusion it is the room which has most to do with this. As Arnie said I'll be back .
|
|
|
Post by jandl100 on Dec 28, 2023 8:05:08 GMT
I pulled my speakers further into the room after seeing bencat's musings. And yes, it worked for me producing a deeper soundstage and better focused imaging. Not quite so convenient in room, and I'm sure I shall curse a bit every time I stub my toe on the speaker platform nearest the door! Hmm. Whoops. The overall tonal balance has shifted up the frequency range. I might want more bass weight than this. Luckily I have a digital equaliser in circuit, I'll have a play with that along with some pink noise. 5 days on, and I've not moved my speakers back to their old nearer to the wall position. I am using my faithful Behringer DEQ2496 digital equaliser to boost the bass a few db below 100hz. I've just got used to and prefer a slightly meatier presentation... I like the cello and double bass sections in an orchestra to growl at me. Yup, still really enjoying the increased spatiality of the presentation. My wife's noticed. No, not the change in sound, but she nearly walked into the left hand speaker yesterday. "Have you moved this?".
|
|
Arke
Moderator
Posts: 1,259
Member is Online
|
Post by Arke on Dec 28, 2023 9:55:33 GMT
Hmm. Whoops. The overall tonal balance has shifted up the frequency range. I might want more bass weight than this. Luckily I have a digital equaliser in circuit, I'll have a play with that along with some pink noise. 5 days on, and I've not moved my speakers back to their old nearer to the wall position. I am using my faithful Behringer DEQ2496 digital equaliser to boost the bass a few db below 100hz. I've just got used to and prefer a slightly meatier presentation... I like the cello and double bass sections in an orchestra to growl at me. Yup, still really enjoying the increased spatiality of the presentation. My wife's noticed. No, not the change in sound, but she nearly walked into the left hand speaker yesterday. "Have you moved this?". I'm definitely with you on the Cello and Double bass growl with orchestral music. I really want to get into classical more, but until recently haven't had a system with enough low end grunt. Classical generally sounds thin, edgy and lifeless without a really decent low end and ambience. I have been experimenting a lot with speaker positioning and my listening position. I recently moved the speakers further out (drivers about 1.5m off rear wall, and 1.7m forward of the window behind). This has greatly improved the spatiality and depth - the speakers have definitely blended into the presentation more. Since the room is long and narrow the listening position can be anywhere from nearfield (about halfway down the room) to the far end of the room. It is generally not advised to sit with a wall or window directly behind you, however, this is currently my preferred position! The presentation seems more live, natural and relaxed. The sounstage is deep and the speakers melt away on decent recordings. Sitting further into the room sounds good but is a little more 'hifi' and seems less realistic. Another bonus with listening at the back is the bass... There is just more of it and that adds warmth and body. It is not too much bass (for me) though 😀.
|
|
|
Post by jandl100 on Dec 28, 2023 10:51:05 GMT
@arke >>It is generally not advised to sit with a wall or window directly behind you, however, this is currently my preferred position! The presentation seems more live, natural and relaxed. The sounstage is deep and the speakers melt away on decent recordings. Sitting further into the room sounds good but is a little more 'hifi' and seems less realistic. <<
That's interesting. I'm forced into close proximity of the wall behind me due to my strong preference for placing speakers on the long wall of listening rooms, and the 20x12 foot dimensions of my room.
I've a 4x4 foot set of GIK 242 absorbing panels on the wall immediately behind my chair to try and 'virtually distance' myself from it. Maybe I need to revisit this setup. Maybe bare wall would be best?
|
|
Arke
Moderator
Posts: 1,259
Member is Online
|
Post by Arke on Dec 28, 2023 12:23:25 GMT
@arke >>It is generally not advised to sit with a wall or window directly behind you, however, this is currently my preferred position! The presentation seems more live, natural and relaxed. The sounstage is deep and the speakers melt away on decent recordings. Sitting further into the room sounds good but is a little more 'hifi' and seems less realistic. << That's interesting. I'm forced into close proximity of the wall behind me due to my strong preference for placing speakers on the long wall of listening rooms, and the 20x12 foot dimensions of my room. I've a 4x4 foot set of GIK 242 absorbing panels on the wall immediately behind my chair to try and 'virtually distance' myself from it. Maybe I need to revisit this setup. Maybe bare wall would be best? My room is about 23ft x 11.5-12.5ft (width varies due to a large alcove). I can't really go across the room due to the location of the door and windows. I am liking down the room as it allows the speakers to be well out into the room and for me to sit a fairly long way away. Not sure why, but the greater distance seems to give a more coherent and natural sound. The downside of down the room is the proximity of the speakers to the sidewalls, although this is countered with some acoustic slat wall and shelves. Across the room would probably provide a wider soundstage, but I would simply be too close to the speakers - probably about 1.5m away if they are well out from the wall. Some more info on my 'in front of the wall/window' listening position. The sofa is quite deep and the window is recessed about 10" back too, so my ears are probably about 2ft in front of the surface of the window. Also, I generally listen with the (heavy and lined) curtains drawn. This is probably why the SQ and presentation is still good back here. I would assume that your acoustic panels will be doing a good job behind your listening position and probably the ideal solution when listening across the room. Have you ever tried without them? I'd imagine the presentation may become slightly more confused by the rear reflections.
|
|
|
Post by jandl100 on Dec 28, 2023 12:31:21 GMT
>>I would assume that your acoustic panels will be doing a good job behind your listening position and probably the ideal solution when listening across the room. Have you ever tried without them? I'd imagine the presentation may become slightly more confused by the rear reflections.<< The panels have been there for a few years now, I recall being impressed by what they did when I put them up, but as this thread has shown it's good to revisit previous assumptions and preferences now and then! It's easy enough to take them down, I'll give it a try sometime if I can be bothered.
|
|
|
Post by jandl100 on Dec 28, 2023 12:54:10 GMT
Actually it's a 4x6 foot composite of GIK 242 panels I've got behind my listening chair. Just to set the record straight.
|
|
|
Post by macca on Dec 28, 2023 13:26:21 GMT
have you ever tried those speakers down the long axis Jerry?
I have no choice over where to put mine, happily the only viable location is a good one and I get the 'sound happening in 3 dimensions behind the speakers' effect.
|
|
|
Post by jandl100 on Dec 28, 2023 13:41:18 GMT
have you ever tried those speakers down the long axis Jerry? I have no choice over where to put mine, happily the only viable location is a good one and I get the 'sound happening in 3 dimensions behind the speakers' effect. Yes. I find I prefer all the speakers I've had (quite a lot!) firing across rather than down the room. I seem to prefer more space to the side of speakers than behind them. Not sure why this is tbh.
|
|
|
Post by jandl100 on Dec 28, 2023 13:45:58 GMT
.... it does seem to make sense with the MBLs with their omni mids and treble and side firing woofers, but I also defo prefer it with conventional direct-fire speakers
|
|
|
Post by macca on Dec 28, 2023 13:47:29 GMT
have you ever tried those speakers down the long axis Jerry? I have no choice over where to put mine, happily the only viable location is a good one and I get the 'sound happening in 3 dimensions behind the speakers' effect. Yes. I find I prefer all the speakers I've had (quite a lot!) firing across rather than down the room. I seem to prefer more space to the side of speakers than behind them. Not sure why this is tbh. I'm a long axis man myself (almost) regardless of the speaker - and I've had loads of them too. It's weird but I have noticed people tend to polarise about this. Apart from those stuck with a square room. I've no idea why either, it should be speaker-related (dispersion) but rarely seems to be.
|
|
Arke
Moderator
Posts: 1,259
Member is Online
|
Post by Arke on Dec 28, 2023 14:18:09 GMT
.... it does seem to make sense with the MBLs with their omni mids and treble and side firing woofers, but I also defo prefer it with conventional direct-fire speakers I'm sure your MBLs would prefer a different setup compared to my speakers. I can see that a long rectangular room is a toss up between a wider or a deeper soundstage. Like I said, my current room only really works firing down the long axis. My last 2 rooms were long axis too, so maybe I have become accustomed to this.
|
|
|
Post by macca on Dec 28, 2023 14:44:56 GMT
.... it does seem to make sense with the MBLs with their omni mids and treble and side firing woofers, but I also defo prefer it with conventional direct-fire speakers I'm sure your MBLs would prefer a different setup compared to my speakers. I can see that a long rectangular room is a toss up between a wider or a deeper soundstage. Like I said, my current room only really works firing down the long axis. My last 2 rooms were long axis too, so maybe I have become accustomed to this. Good point about the soundstage - Jerry likes classical but for my choice of music the soundstage is all artificial anyway so the width isn't that important to me. But I do like the sound to exist seemingly independent of the speakers even if I'm not sat directly on axis. I'd say that is my main criteria. Speakers that don't do that don't last long with me.
|
|
Arke
Moderator
Posts: 1,259
Member is Online
|
Post by Arke on Dec 28, 2023 15:42:49 GMT
I'm sure your MBLs would prefer a different setup compared to my speakers. I can see that a long rectangular room is a toss up between a wider or a deeper soundstage. Like I said, my current room only really works firing down the long axis. My last 2 rooms were long axis too, so maybe I have become accustomed to this. Good point about the soundstage - Jerry likes classical but for my choice of music the soundstage is all artificial anyway so the width isn't that important to me. But I do like the sound to exist seemingly independent of the speakers even if I'm not sat directly on axis. I'd say that is my main criteria. Speakers that don't do that don't last long with me. How far back do sit Martin? (relative to overall length of room)
|
|
|
Post by macca on Dec 28, 2023 17:51:43 GMT
Good point about the soundstage - Jerry likes classical but for my choice of music the soundstage is all artificial anyway so the width isn't that important to me. But I do like the sound to exist seemingly independent of the speakers even if I'm not sat directly on axis. I'd say that is my main criteria. Speakers that don't do that don't last long with me. How far back do sit Martin? (relative to overall length of room) the room is 29' with speakers about 8' into the room and then another 16' to the couch. But I don't usually sit there unless I'm 'listening seriously'. I usually sit off axis about 10' from the speakers.
|
|
|
Post by bencat on Jan 12, 2024 14:04:49 GMT
Well apologies to all over the delay I had planned to try to further investigate this but I needed a day when Linda was at work and my friend Graham was free to get things in place . Graham came over this morning with a small pair of Wharfdale speakers and some stands .
We set them up well over halfway in to the rooms and about 1 meter in front of the listening position . The speakers were pointed straight ahead with not toe in and about 90 inches apart . Fired them up and having tried this with the Quads which failed to work it was great to instantly find that using more conventional speakers with moving coil drivers that exactly as in Grahams room i was hearing the same thing .
Despite how close the speakers were to me sitting listening there did not appear to be any sound emanating in front of the speakers as there had been with the quads . Instead there was a very large (some recordings much larger than others ) soundstage behind the speakers were the performance was taking place . Instruments were clearly in there own space some closer than others and the Vocals were in most cases front and center . The effect was very realistic but changed with each recording so Talking Heads Take Me To The River was really huge lots of width , depth and full height . It was also obvious on some recordings Sara K Blind Hearted from the album Waterfalls was one she is sitting down when singing and appears at that reduced height level . Others like Cassandra Wilson are most clearly standing up and singing in to a mic .
This is a very realistic acoustic setting being created and for the music to emerge from and as stated it changes with each different recording . It is i fully realise a very difficult set up for any sort of normal life and if you have children lock the door when you try it or bad things could happen . I am glad that it is not just Grahams room and system that can make this trick work and I would encourage anyone to give this a try and let us all know what you hear if anything different than your normal set up . If I had the time I would have moved the speakers back an inch at a time towards the back wall behind them to find out how far out you need to get in to the room before the image collapses . Graham is convinced it needs to be really close to the listener but I think it will be possible further away as well . Perhaps that can be done another day .
I can fully see that no speaker mfg is going to ever suggest this sort of placement but I do really wonder if they are fully aware of this trick ? They design speakers to fit sensibly in to a domestic environment and be acceptable so this sort of extreme placement is not what these speakers were made for but they certainly in my view perform much better than they do compared to any accepted placement i have used. I would also add that all the speakers used both at Grahams and today at mine are ported speakers so designed for free space . I do not know if the same thing could be achieved with a sealed baffle speakers that are often designed with wall enforcement to beef up the bass .
So I find this interesting and would welcome any feedback from anyone else who is prepared to give it a try .
|
|
|
Post by macca on Jan 12, 2024 18:53:10 GMT
I don't agree with your friend that you have to sit close to the speakers to get a proper stereo soundstage - although that may well be the case in his room, for whatever reasons.
A speaker is just a mic in reverse so the soundstage (assuming no weird processing like Q Sound was used on the recording) should always exist behind the plane of the speakers.
Speakers that put the singer on the carpet out in front usually have a hump in the midrange frequency response. Some people like that even though it is a colouration and will create unrelated problems with many recordings.
If there's no choice but to place the speaker close to the wall, diffusion panels behind the speakers should help enormously with countering the effect of the sound bouncing back and ruining the soundstage
The best I have ever heard soundstaging was with Linkwitz LX521 speakers, never heard anything come remotely close. We were not sat close to the speakers and they were maybe 4/5 feet in front of the rear wall. It was jaw-dropping.
|
|
|
Post by bencat on Jan 12, 2024 20:46:57 GMT
Thanks Mecca that is your view on what you have heard . It is not just my friends view which I thought I had made clear and was why I did this in my room with my equipment . What I heard I have never experienced with loudspeaker in a conventional set up . Yet now in two separate systems and rooms I have heard the same things . Perhaps you should try it and see what you hear . You may well find that it does nothing for you and view that I am wrong which is fair but you need to try it first .
|
|
|
Post by macca on Jan 12, 2024 21:09:31 GMT
Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you are describing but it does sound like you're just describing good soundstaging?
Three dimensional soundscape behind the speakers, sound is seemingly totally independent of the boxes.
Can you expand on what is special with this configuration?
My speakers are a 3 way 4 driver design, if I sit really close they just don't work so well, needs a little distance for the sound to converge.
|
|
|
Post by jandl100 on Jan 13, 2024 4:35:47 GMT
Sound quality can just be better without meaning that lesser presentations are poor.
I was happy with the soundstaging on my system. Then prompted by this thread I pulled the speakers even further forward and shuffled my chair closer, and it was even better.
But yes, negative aspects like drivers not melding if heard closer could overwhelm the benefit, if any, of the Bencat Effect.
I don't think I want to go to the awful extreme of 1 metre from the speakers just in case it is wonderful! Simply totally impractical.
|
|
|
Post by jandl100 on Jan 13, 2024 5:01:28 GMT
A speaker is just a mic in reverse.... Is that right? Stereo recordings can be, and often are, made with a closely spaced microphone pair, with the L and R mic less than a foot apart or even coincident with a small vertical spacing. You wouldn't hear the stereo effect with the two speakers touching each other. So it's quite a bit more complicated than a speaker simply being a mic in reverse. Must confess I'd not really looked into this before. I found this article very interesting www.dpamicrophones.com/mic-university/stereo-recording-techniques-and-setups
|
|
|
Post by macca on Jan 13, 2024 9:07:58 GMT
A speaker is just a mic in reverse.... Is that right? Stereo recordings can be, and often are, made with a closely spaced microphone pair, with the L and R mic less than a foot apart or even coincident with a small vertical spacing. You wouldn't hear the stereo effect with the two speakers touching each other. So it's quite a bit more complicated than a speaker simply being a mic in reverse. Must confess I'd not really looked into this before. I found this article very interesting www.dpamicrophones.com/mic-university/stereo-recording-techniques-and-setupswhat I meant was a mic works by moving air hitting its diaphragm and creating a voltage, a speaker works by a voltage causing a driver to move air.
|
|