|
|
Post by antonio on Oct 26, 2022 21:03:01 GMT
Well you need some headphones macca , I could clearly hear a difference, not huge but a difference. |
|
Arke
Moderator
Posts: 1,259
|
Post by Arke on Oct 27, 2022 6:42:10 GMT
Well you need some headphones macca , I could clearly hear a difference, not huge but a difference. My wife couldn't care less, and could easily hear the Arke Duos had no bass for a few days. She was then amazed how big they sounded after a week. Nothing else changed, they just broke in. She has no reason to kid herself about whether break in is real or not - she doesn't care. |
|
|
|
Post by macca on Oct 27, 2022 8:03:18 GMT
Well you need some headphones macca , I could clearly hear a difference, not huge but a difference. like I said there could be reasons for that other than the amp breaking in. Just having the mic in a slightly different position from the first time for example. We don't have any info on what controls or methods he used, so this can't be accepted as evidence of anything. Sorry. if it was a test to show that amplifiers don't burn in the same would be true. |
|
|
|
Post by sq225917 on Oct 27, 2022 15:43:57 GMT
The full klippel test runs 1000 measurements, 3 second bursts and uses full range signal. So equivalent to over 40 minutes of full range run in and much greater thermal cycling.
|
|
Arke
Moderator
Posts: 1,259
|
Post by Arke on Oct 27, 2022 15:47:03 GMT
The full klippel test runs 1000 measurements, 3 second bursts and uses full range signal. So equivalent to over 40 minutes of full range run in and much greater thermal cycling. But not equivalent to 100hrs? I assume it's 3 seconds bursts over the entire frequency range, so not many minutes of Low frequency. I thought the best way to break in quickly would be to play a few hours of Low frequency at high amplitude. |
|
