|
Post by hudz on Mar 9, 2020 13:09:27 GMT
I recently aquired a pair of 80's Diesis speakers and while being pleased with how they perform there is a noticeble difference in volume between them. Had a quick look at the xovers and there are 3 electrolytics in there:- 1 elcap 12mfd 50v and 2alcaps together 3.3+4.7mfd 50v. Going to change them anyway like for like and was wondering whether I can change to polyprops without screwing up the xover points/ESR/FR, I'm capable with a soldering iron but usually just send my xovers to Paul at RFC as I obviously lack his expertise, and apart from that I'm well skint. Any help and advice from knowledgable brethren would be appreciated as I really don't have a clue about cap properties/types but fancy a challenge. Trying unsuccessfully to add a photo, bejesus,cracked it I'm no David Bailey but this should explain.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Mar 9, 2020 14:22:47 GMT
The two smaller ones could easily be replaced with a pair of poly caps I feel as long as the legs are long enough. The Elcap thingy really ought to be looked at first if anything (maybe a personal beef about them).
If any of these caps are in series with the tweeter, then poly caps will have less resistance and will increase tweeter output a touch - THIS is often what is heard as an 'improvement' in my experience, so be careful.
They're not cheap suppliers, but Falcon do a matching service on electrolytics and they did me a pair of 5% matched 35uF electrolytics for my IMF Compacts when I updated them. I replaced the 1uF tweeter cap (it's more a kind of super-tweeter in these) with a poly one and the output definitely increased slightly..
Good luck. I quite liked the original Solitaire back then but it was a bit 'dry' sounding and needed power I felt.
|
|
|
Post by hudz on Mar 9, 2020 15:02:11 GMT
The two smaller ones could easily be replaced with a pair of poly caps I feel as long as the legs are long enough. The Elcap thingy really ought to be looked at first if anything (maybe a personal beef about them). If any of these caps are in series with the tweeter, then poly caps will have less resistance and will increase tweeter output a touch - THIS is often what is heard as an 'improvement' in my experience, so be careful. They're not cheap suppliers, but Falcon do a matching service on electrolytics and they did me a pair of 5% matched 35uF electrolytics for my IMF Compacts when I updated them. I replaced the 1uF tweeter cap (it's more a kind of super-tweeter in these) with a poly one and the output definitely increased slightly.. Good luck. I quite liked the original Solitaire back then but it was a bit 'dry' sounding and needed power I felt. Thanks Dave, I replaced all the Elcaps for Alcap 'lytics in my B&W D5S and that made a massive difference in clarity, but was that 'cos they were old and knackered? I know what you mean about these being a bit power hungry, I've had to drag the modded 405-2 off the subs bench to run them. Been looking around for replacements and may go with these www.wilmslowaudio.co.uk/mundorf-electrolytic-ecap-capacitors-130-c.asp to avoid any issues with the tweeter as they're quite lively as it is and I don't want to start adding resistors to pad it back down again.
But I can't make up the 12mfd for the larger one, even combining caps in the same range so may have to go with a 100V ALCAP 12mfd www.falconacoustics.co.uk/alcap-claritycap-solen-audio-capacitors/alcap-electrolytic-capacitors-low-loss-50v-100v.html?p=2
Any glaringly obvious flaws in my selection?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2020 16:18:10 GMT
Hi Hudz
Change them all.
No fancy pants components needed.
Replace the 12uF using a JB (JFX) 12uF poly as long as it's matched to 5% or better, otherwise make up using a 6.8 and a 4.7 for an 11.5uF total value which is within 5% of factory specified and will be fine.
For the HF use Jantzen standard Z caps of the same value.
The ESR difference between BRIDGED electrolytics and polys is minuscule, wrt new components. From the factory, a pair of elcaps brand new in a raw cap as opposed to a low loss 'lytic would be no more than 0.2 Ohms with two combined, and probably lower. The Polys probably under 0.1Ohms. There will be no measurable frequency response difference between those types in that crossover from new, but expect a big difference in detail from what you have now as the ESR will have risen in those old ones as well as the capacitance value probably drifting which will shift crossover.
For the LF, the difference between a plain 'lytic and a poly is about 0.2 to 0.3 Ohms ESR, or less, but certainly no more, so swapping out for polys there will only alter slope value very slightly (steepen it fractionally) when comparing like for like new values. With the older cap, you will likely have a slight flattening of the slope's 2nd pole meaning a crossover point a little higher than design spec with some slight phasing and matching issues but the main improvement is that in both cases, thermal drift will be non existent for the polys.
It won't need fancy pants expensive caps to notice a significant improvement. Clean the lead out legs off, keep them short and mechanically crimp them to the other connections using thin nose pliers and solder (that way no dry joint issues will happen in the future).
Doing as I advise above will restore them to factory response or as near as is possible. Don't use electrolytics...they have no place in any high fidelity crossover.
If you don't like the sound as the HF is too lively then it was likely the same from new. You can alter the L-Pad but only a little otherwise step changes in sensitivity shift the crossover point and ruin phase response. If you can provide me details of the tweeter and the L-pad resistor values you currently have there, I can probably advise of minor tweaks to lower the HF a little without ruining the crossover.
|
|
|
Post by hudz on Mar 9, 2020 16:42:47 GMT
Hi Hudz Change them all. No fancy pants components needed. Replace the 12uF using a JB (JFX) 12uF poly as long as it's matched to 5% or better, otherwise make up using a 6.8 and a 4.7 for an 11.5uF total value which is within 5% of factory specified and will be fine. For the HF use Jantzen standard Z caps of the same value. The ESR difference between BRIDGED electrolytics and polys is minuscule, wrt new components. From the factory, a pair of elcaps brand new in a raw cap as opposed to a low loss 'lytic would be no more than 0.2 Ohms with two combined, and probably lower. The Polys probably under 0.1Ohms. There will be no measurable frequency response difference between those types in that crossover from new, but expect a big difference in detail from what you have now as the ESR will have risen in those old ones as well as the capacitance value probably drifting which will shift crossover. For the LF, the difference between a plain 'lytic and a poly is about 0.2 to 0.3 Ohms ESR, or less, but certainly no more, so swapping out for polys there will only alter slope value very slightly (steepen it fractionally) when comparing like for like new values. With the older cap, you will likely have a slight flattening of the slope's 2nd pole meaning a crossover point a little higher than design spec with some slight phasing and matching issues but the main improvement is that in both cases, thermal drift will be non existent for the polys. It won't need fancy pants expensive caps to notice a significant improvement. Clean the lead out legs off, keep them short and mechanically crimp them to the other connections using thin nose pliers and solder (that way no dry joint issues will happen in the future). Doing as I advise above will restore them to factory response or as near as is possible. Don't use electrolytics...they have no place in any high fidelity crossover. If you don't like the sound as the HF is too lively then it was likely the same from new. You can alter the L-Pad but only a little otherwise step changes in sensitivity shift the crossover point and ruin phase response. If you can provide me details of the tweeter and the L-pad resistor values you currently have there, I can probably advise of minor tweaks to lower the HF a little without ruining the crossover. Thanks Paul, Ill go with your recommendations for now, they may eventually end up at Coupe Towers to have the inductor changed to an air core, when funds allow. Tweeter response is fine, I think the problem was some silver plated ofc speaker cable. Those Heybrook Hb3s you did for me years ago are still going strong, but my listening room has shrank hence the need for standmounts. Great to see you found a forum where your knowledge is valued. Martin
|
|
|
Post by hudz on Mar 9, 2020 17:06:21 GMT
Brilliant, thanks Paul and Dave, parts ordered for the princely sum of £25. I would have bought Mundorf, Clarity cap or other big names, saved a good few quid. I'll update when the patients have had their surgery. Buzzin
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2020 17:27:48 GMT
Hi Hudz Change them all. No fancy pants components needed. Replace the 12uF using a JB (JFX) 12uF poly as long as it's matched to 5% or better, otherwise make up using a 6.8 and a 4.7 for an 11.5uF total value which is within 5% of factory specified and will be fine. For the HF use Jantzen standard Z caps of the same value. The ESR difference between BRIDGED electrolytics and polys is minuscule, wrt new components. From the factory, a pair of elcaps brand new in a raw cap as opposed to a low loss 'lytic would be no more than 0.2 Ohms with two combined, and probably lower. The Polys probably under 0.1Ohms. There will be no measurable frequency response difference between those types in that crossover from new, but expect a big difference in detail from what you have now as the ESR will have risen in those old ones as well as the capacitance value probably drifting which will shift crossover. For the LF, the difference between a plain 'lytic and a poly is about 0.2 to 0.3 Ohms ESR, or less, but certainly no more, so swapping out for polys there will only alter slope value very slightly (steepen it fractionally) when comparing like for like new values. With the older cap, you will likely have a slight flattening of the slope's 2nd pole meaning a crossover point a little higher than design spec with some slight phasing and matching issues but the main improvement is that in both cases, thermal drift will be non existent for the polys. It won't need fancy pants expensive caps to notice a significant improvement. Clean the lead out legs off, keep them short and mechanically crimp them to the other connections using thin nose pliers and solder (that way no dry joint issues will happen in the future). Doing as I advise above will restore them to factory response or as near as is possible. Don't use electrolytics...they have no place in any high fidelity crossover. If you don't like the sound as the HF is too lively then it was likely the same from new. You can alter the L-Pad but only a little otherwise step changes in sensitivity shift the crossover point and ruin phase response. If you can provide me details of the tweeter and the L-pad resistor values you currently have there, I can probably advise of minor tweaks to lower the HF a little without ruining the crossover. Thanks Paul, Ill go with your recommendations for now, they may eventually end up at Coupe Towers when funds allow. Tweeter response is fine, I think the problem was some silver plated ofc speaker cable. Those Heybrook Hb3s you did for me years ago are still going strong, but my listening room has shrank hence the need for standmounts. Great to see you found a forum where your knowledge is valued. Martin Thanks Martin. I'm not really a fan of hifi forums tbh Martin but Oli sold this one as more a chat space amongst friends. I left hifi forums a few years back because I was busy with a business to run (as now) and secondly, I'd had enough of the arrogant, condescending attitudes of some owners (they know who they are. I'm pretty up-front and honest and was so with them). Then there were some of the more argumentative members who lacked any sort of integrity, grace or understanding.... I won't get drawn into online immaturity or ad-hominem attacks. Life's too short for that nonsense. On the speaker front, silver cable won't in itself alter frequency response one iota. "Brightness" as usually perceived, is an eminently measurable phenomena and perceptions of "bright" or "harsh" usually have two main culprits: High distortion or up-turned mid/HF or both those things. Silver's properties are only that it is slightly more conductive than copper and that is not going to alter how a crossover filter drives a speaker. Cable geometry differences might conceivably result in sonic changes but that's usually where the driving amp doesn't like reactive loads such as highly capacitative speaker cable geometries.
|
|
|
Post by hudz on Mar 9, 2020 18:19:32 GMT
|
|
|
Post by firebottle on Mar 9, 2020 18:47:42 GMT
Are you calling Oli a big bald bouncer?
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,398
|
Post by Bigman80 on Mar 9, 2020 19:22:11 GMT
Big Bald Bouncer.....lol.
It is pretty much as you've decribed there, Martin.
We have no interest in conflict here, or challenging the very valid personal experiences of the individual. If you hear it, we trust you heard it...that's how we roll.
And yes, Paul's excellent contributions to the "snug" as I'm now calling it, are gratefully received and appreciated.
I'm glad were achieving what was set out in the beginning.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2020 19:32:34 GMT
It's a nice laid back set up Oli.
|
|
|
Post by hudz on Mar 9, 2020 19:57:49 GMT
Are you calling Oli a big bald bouncer? To his face? errrrrrrrrr..........nope
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,398
|
Post by Bigman80 on Mar 9, 2020 22:06:37 GMT
It's a nice laid back set up Oli. How it should be!
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,398
|
Post by Bigman80 on Mar 9, 2020 22:06:52 GMT
Are you calling Oli a big bald bouncer? To his face? errrrrrrrrr..........nope Chicken....lol
|
|
|
Post by hudz on Mar 9, 2020 23:08:55 GMT
To his face? errrrrrrrrr..........nope Chicken....lol 5 ft 6 and 'bout 60 kilos over here wet through, so chicken out of necessity, carn't arf run though... lol
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,398
|
Post by Bigman80 on Mar 10, 2020 7:41:48 GMT
5 ft 6 and 'bout 60 kilos over here wet through, so chicken out of necessity, carn't arf run though... lol Hahaha! I'm fast over the first three yards, you're safe after that ;D
|
|
|
Post by hudz on Mar 11, 2020 12:39:39 GMT
Well caps have arrived and have been fitted, wasn't expecting any massive improvements but straight away cymbals sound a lot more real and female voices in particular are much more prominant in the mix, like I've moved forward a couple of rows.
Even using the syruppy quad 405-2 and battery tda1543 dac I can still hear the potential, so next step A topping d30? So far with only an hour on them a notable positive improvement and the level imbalance is gone.
Thanks to all, especially Paul and Dave for pointing me in the right direction.
|
|
|
Post by firebottle on Mar 11, 2020 14:22:52 GMT
Hudz get a Topping D50, you won't be disappointed.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Mar 11, 2020 14:55:20 GMT
Quad 405-2 SYRUPY??? Wash your ears out sir It sparkles if anything (well my two samples did years ago), especially for the first few hours after turn on. I'd have another, although I used to bake mine to almost Krell levels at the volumes I played at - cough...
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,398
|
Post by Bigman80 on Mar 11, 2020 15:18:53 GMT
Quad 405-2 SYRUPY??? Wash your ears out sir It sparkles if anything (well my two samples did years ago), especially for the first few hours after turn on. I'd have another, although I used to bake mine to almost Krell levels at the volumes I played at - cough... Christ on a bike Dave, The 405-2 sounds like its been dipped in honey and left outside on a warm sunny day. And just like Sh#t, its covered in flies too. Not meaning to be disrespectful to those that own, use and enjoy that amp. More power to your elbow but in the realms of the ability it has vs that of say a Hypex amp or the Orchard BOSC, its simply not in the same library as the good books. Mills n Boon type stuff.
|
|
|
Post by firebottle on Mar 11, 2020 15:50:45 GMT
'Mills and Boon stuff' I used a 405-2 (equivalent - with Quad boards) for many years, you could say before my eyes were opened to better stuff, or it could be I was a bit skint. When I took a punt and built an OTL Transcendent valve amp I thought 'if I don't like it I can sell it', however it only confirmed the suspicion I had held for a long time that the 405 wasn't really up there in terms of transparency. I would rather not listen to music than go backwards to the sound of the 405.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2020 16:45:01 GMT
Well caps have arrived and have been fitted, wasn't expecting any massive improvements but straight away cymbals sound a lot more real and female voices in particular are much more prominant in the mix, like I've moved forward a couple of rows. Even using the syruppy quad 405-2 and battery tda1543 dac I can still hear the potential, so next step A topping d30? So far with only an hour on them a notable positive improvement and the level imbalance is gone. Thanks to all, especially Paul and Dave for pointing me in the right direction. Good stuff Martin. They will fill out a little in sound as the caps fully stabilise which can take a few hours (no longer).
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
The HiFi Bear/Audioaddicts/Bigbottle Owner
Posts: 16,398
|
Post by Bigman80 on Mar 11, 2020 17:56:31 GMT
Well caps have arrived and have been fitted, wasn't expecting any massive improvements but straight away cymbals sound a lot more real and female voices in particular are much more prominant in the mix, like I've moved forward a couple of rows. Even using the syruppy quad 405-2 and battery tda1543 dac I can still hear the potential, so next step A topping d30? So far with only an hour on them a notable positive improvement and the level imbalance is gone. Thanks to all, especially Paul and Dave for pointing me in the right direction. Great result. Congratulations!!
|
|
|
Post by hudz on Mar 11, 2020 18:06:11 GMT
Hudz get a Topping D50, you won't be disappointed. Thanks for the recommendation, was looking at the one that just sold, some lucky bugger got a bargain, wonder who............. Hopefully by the time I get mine a certain someone will have learned how to supercharge them.
|
|
|
Post by firebottle on Mar 11, 2020 18:12:07 GMT
Ha, they don't need supercharging, really.
The only slight problem is the SPDIF input isn't 75 ohms, easily fixed with a resistor.
|
|
|
Post by hudz on Mar 11, 2020 18:13:35 GMT
Quad 405-2 SYRUPY??? Wash your ears out sir It sparkles if anything (well my two samples did years ago), especially for the first few hours after turn on. I'd have another, although I used to bake mine to almost Krell levels at the volumes I played at - cough... Christ on a bike Dave, The 405-2 sounds like its been dipped in honey and left outside on a warm sunny day. And just like Sh#t, its covered in flies too. Not meaning to be disrespectful to those that own, use and enjoy that amp. More power to your elbow but in the realms of the ability it has vs that of say a Hypex amp or the Orchard BOSC, its simply not in the same library as the good books. Mills n Boon type stuff.. Yep, all frilly, rosy kak and no real substance. Big knickers kinda amp. Can;t afford owt decent at the mo, so stuck with it, it has had a few mods but I've heard a Kell kav 250 recently and had my ears opened.
|
|
|
Post by hudz on Mar 11, 2020 18:15:31 GMT
Ha, they don't need supercharging, really. The only slight problem is the SPDIF input isn't 75 ohms, easily fixed with a resistor. I use optical or usb mostly, need the isolation from the pc bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. My phillips cd has a cathode follower output so no coax, sounds mint with a pair of the now (thanks to Oli) getting expensive gold label Teslas in. Need to get EL Capitaine to rubbish them so the price goes down again, look what he did to the telefunkens
|
|
|
Post by hudz on Mar 11, 2020 18:18:28 GMT
Well caps have arrived and have been fitted, wasn't expecting any massive improvements but straight away cymbals sound a lot more real and female voices in particular are much more prominant in the mix, like I've moved forward a couple of rows. Even using the syruppy quad 405-2 and battery tda1543 dac I can still hear the potential, so next step A topping d30? So far with only an hour on them a notable positive improvement and the level imbalance is gone. Thanks to all, especially Paul and Dave for pointing me in the right direction. Good stuff Martin. They will fill out a little in sound as the caps fully stabilise which can take a few hours (no longer). Left them running all day and now the thumpy bass has been and gone I'm very pleased with the result. Cheers again Very nimble and airy they sound now.
|
|
|
Post by hudz on Mar 11, 2020 20:33:14 GMT
Well caps have arrived and have been fitted, wasn't expecting any massive improvements but straight away cymbals sound a lot more real and female voices in particular are much more prominant in the mix, like I've moved forward a couple of rows. Even using the syruppy quad 405-2 and battery tda1543 dac I can still hear the potential, so next step A topping d30? So far with only an hour on them a notable positive improvement and the level imbalance is gone. Thanks to all, especially Paul and Dave for pointing me in the right direction. Great result. Congratulations!! Cheers big fella
|
|